• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

121 例行经皮二尖瓣缘对缘修复术患者的临床及血液动力学结果 - 来自单中心韩国机构的早期结果。

Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in 121 Patients Who Underwent Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation - Early Results From a Single Korean Institution.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Circ J. 2021 Jun 25;85(7):1011-1017. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0023. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0023
PMID:33994411
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of Perceval sutureless valves in the Korean population and to introduce a modified technique of guiding suture placement during valve deployment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From December 2014 to April 2019, 121 patients (mean age: 74.7±6.2 years; 53.7% female) received a Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement. To prevent conduction system injury, the depth of guiding suture placement (1 mm below the nadir of the annulus) was modified. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation at discharge and 6-12 months postoperatively, with a mean follow up of 13.7±11.2 months. Concomitant surgeries, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, and other valvular surgeries, were performed in 45.5% of cases. The mean aortic cross-clamp times for isolated and minimal procedures were 32.8±7.9, and 41.2±8.0 min, respectively. The overall transvalvular mean gradients were 13.1±3.8 mmHg at discharge and 11.5±4.7 mmHg at the last follow up. After modifying the guiding suture placement, permanent pacemaker implantation risk decreased from 9.9% to 2.5%. Cardiac-related mortality was 0.8%, with no patient developing valvular or paravalvular aortic regurgitation, valve thrombosis, or endocarditis.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceval valve implantation provided a significant cardiac-related survival benefit with excellent early hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to determine whether adjusting the implantation depth, such as modification of the guiding suture technique, can reduce the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估 Perceval 无缝线瓣膜在韩国人群中的早期结果,并介绍一种改良的瓣膜展开时引导缝线放置技术。

方法和结果

2014 年 12 月至 2019 年 4 月,121 例患者(平均年龄:74.7±6.2 岁;53.7%为女性)接受了 Perceval 无缝线主动脉瓣置换术。为了防止传导系统损伤,改良了引导缝线放置的深度(瓣环最低点下方 1mm)。所有患者在出院时和术后 6-12 个月进行超声心动图评估,平均随访 13.7±11.2 个月。45.5%的患者同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术和其他瓣膜手术。单纯和最小手术的平均主动脉阻断时间分别为 32.8±7.9 和 41.2±8.0min。出院时和最后一次随访时跨瓣平均梯度分别为 13.1±3.8mmHg 和 11.5±4.7mmHg。改良引导缝线放置后,永久性起搏器植入风险从 9.9%降至 2.5%。心脏相关死亡率为 0.8%,无患者发生瓣叶或瓣周主动脉瓣反流、瓣膜血栓形成或心内膜炎。

结论

Perceval 瓣膜植入术提供了显著的心脏相关生存获益,早期血液动力学和临床结果良好。需要进一步研究确定调整植入深度,如改良引导缝线技术,是否可以降低永久性起搏器植入的风险。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in 121 Patients Who Underwent Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation - Early Results From a Single Korean Institution.121 例行经皮二尖瓣缘对缘修复术患者的临床及血液动力学结果 - 来自单中心韩国机构的早期结果。
Circ J. 2021 Jun 25;85(7):1011-1017. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0023. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄:系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.02.021. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
3
Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.与带支架的Carpentier-Edwards Perimount主动脉瓣相比的无缝合Perceval主动脉瓣。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Mar;23(2):253-8.
4
Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?使用无缝合人工瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换:是否比扩大根部更能避免人工瓣膜与患者不匹配?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;22(6):744-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw041. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: Surgical and clinical outcomes.主动脉瓣置换术的无缝合生物瓣:手术和临床结果。
J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):4774-4782. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17113. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
6
Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.新一代生物假体主动脉瓣置换术:无缝合与快速部署。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):432-442.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135. Epub 2019 May 11.
7
Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与传统主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的临床研究进展
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):e006091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006091.
8
9
Tackling the Issue of High Postoperative Pacemaker Implantation Rates in Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: Should Balloon Inflation be Removed from the Implantation Method of the Perceval Prosthesis?解决无缝合主动脉瓣置换术后起搏器植入率高的问题:是否应从Perceval人工瓣膜植入方法中去除球囊扩张步骤?
J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 May;26(3):247-254.
10
Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.无缝合和快速植入瓣膜与传统生物假体的血流动力学比较。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68(7):584-594. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683426. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Perceval Valves in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.老年患者中Perceval瓣膜的应用:一项系统评价
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 28;26(7):39463. doi: 10.31083/RCM39463. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Urgent Myectomy for Hemodynamic Instability: Leveraging the Advantages of a Perceval Sutureless Valve for Unexpected Systolic Anterior Motion After Declamping the Aorta.针对血流动力学不稳定的紧急心肌切除术:利用Perceval无缝合瓣膜的优势应对主动脉阻断解除后意外的收缩期前向运动。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80944. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Conventional vs. Sutureless Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis: Is Faster Better?
传统主动脉瓣生物假体与无缝合主动脉瓣生物假体:更快就更好吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jul 20;10(7):311. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070311.
4
1-year outcomes of patients implanted with the Perceval sutureless valve: the Japanese post-marketing surveillance study.植入 Perceval 无缝线瓣膜患者的 1 年结果:日本上市后监测研究。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Jul;38(7):949-956. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02240-1. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Conventional Prostheses versus Sutureless Perceval for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.常规假体与无缝线 Percival 在主动脉瓣置换术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jun 20;29(3):107-124. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.22-00125. Epub 2022 Dec 15.