Ellis Jules L
Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):549-568. doi: 10.1177/0013164420963163. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
This study develops a theoretical model for the costs of an exam as a function of its duration. Two kind of costs are distinguished: (1) the costs of measurement errors and (2) the costs of the measurement. Both costs are expressed in time of the student. Based on a classical test theory model, enriched with assumptions on the context, the costs of the exam can be expressed as a function of various parameters, including the duration of the exam. It is shown that these costs can be minimized in time. Applied in a real example with reliability .80, the outcome is that the optimal exam time would be much shorter and would have reliability .675. The consequences of the model are investigated and discussed. One of the consequences is that optimal exam duration depends on the study load of the course, all other things being equal. It is argued that it is worthwhile to investigate empirically how much time students spend on preparing for resits. Six variants of the model are distinguished, which differ in their weights of the errors and in the way grades affect how much time students study for the resit.
本研究建立了一个考试成本作为考试时长函数的理论模型。区分了两种成本:(1)测量误差成本和(2)测量成本。这两种成本均以学生的时间来表示。基于一个经典测试理论模型,并结合对情境的假设,考试成本可以表示为包括考试时长在内的各种参数的函数。结果表明,这些成本可以在时间上实现最小化。应用于一个可靠性为0.80的实际例子中,结果是最优考试时间会短得多,且可靠性为0.675。对该模型的后果进行了研究和讨论。其中一个后果是,在其他条件相同的情况下,最优考试时长取决于课程的学习负担。有人认为,实证研究学生为补考准备花费多少时间是值得的。区分了该模型的六个变体,它们在误差权重以及成绩对学生为补考学习时间的影响方式上有所不同。