Creese Sadie, Dutton William H, Esteve-González Patricia
Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2021;25(5):941-955. doi: 10.1007/s00779-021-01569-6. Epub 2021 May 10.
This paper presents an empirical study of the social and cultural aspects of cybersecurity capacity building in 78 nations. While nations within geographically defined regions might be expected to share similar attitudes, values, and practices around cybersecurity, this analysis finds that regional differences can be explained largely by cross-national differences in development and the scale of Internet use. These results question the centrality of regions in shaping social and cultural attributes directly tied to cybersecurity capacity. However, the analysis identifies some countries with greater and some with lesser levels of maturity in capacity building than expected only on the basis of their development and scale of Internet use. Further research focused on the dynamics of under- and over-performance of different nations might illuminate where regional contexts could place a brake on, or provide an impetus for, under- or over-performance in cybersecurity capacity building. That said, national development and the scale of Internet use are the most explanatory of cultural attitudes, values, and practices of societies tied to cybersecurity, such as trust on the Internet.
本文对78个国家网络安全能力建设的社会和文化方面进行了实证研究。虽然地理区域内的国家可能会被认为在网络安全方面有着相似的态度、价值观和做法,但该分析发现,区域差异在很大程度上可以由跨国发展差异和互联网使用规模来解释。这些结果对区域在塑造与网络安全能力直接相关的社会和文化属性方面的核心地位提出了质疑。然而,该分析还发现,有些国家的能力建设成熟度高于预期,而有些国家则低于预期,这仅基于它们的发展水平和互联网使用规模。进一步聚焦于不同国家表现不佳和表现过度动态情况的研究,可能会阐明区域背景在何处可能阻碍或推动网络安全能力建设中的表现不佳或表现过度。话虽如此,国家发展和互联网使用规模最能解释与网络安全相关的社会文化态度、价值观和做法,比如对互联网的信任。