Suppr超能文献

人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。

Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Solna, Sweden.

School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.

Abstract

Cybersecurity is increasingly becoming a prominent concern among healthcare providers in adopting digital technologies for improving the quality of care delivered to patients. The recent reports on cyber attacks, such as ransomware and WannaCry, have brought to life the destructive nature of such attacks upon healthcare. In complement to cyberattacks, which have been targeted against the vulnerabilities of information technology (IT) infrastructures, a new form of cyber attack aims to exploit human vulnerabilities; such attacks are categorised as social engineering attacks. Following an increase in the frequency and ingenuity of attacks launched against hospitals and clinical environments with the intention of causing service disruption, there is a strong need to study the level of awareness programmes and training activities offered to the staff by healthcare organisations. The objective of this systematic review is to identify commonly encountered factors that cybersecurity postures of a healthcare organisation, resulting from the ignorance of cyber threat to healthcare. The systematic review aims to consolidate the current literature being reported upon human behaviour resulting in security gaps that mitigate the cyber defence strategy adopted by healthcare organisations. Additionally, the paper also reviews the organisational risk assessment methodology implemented and the policies being adopted to strengthen cybersecurity. The topic of cybersecurity within healthcare and the clinical environment has attracted the interest of several researchers, resulting in a broad range of literature. The inclusion criteria for the articles in the review stem from the scope of the five research questions identified. To this end, we conducted seven search queries across three repositories, namely (i) PubMed/MED-LINE; (ii) Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL); and (iii) Web of Science (WoS), using key words related to cybersecurity awareness, training, organisation risk assessment methodologies, policies and recommendations adopted as counter measures within health care. These were restricted to around the last 12 years. A total of 70 articles were selected to be included in the review, which addresses the complexity of cybersecurity measures adopted within the healthcare and clinical environments. The articles included in the review highlight the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats stemming from exploiting IT infrastructures to more advanced attacks launched with the intent of exploiting human vulnerability. A steady increase in the literature on the threat of phishing attacks evidences the growing threat of social engineering attacks. As a countermeasure, through the review, we identified articles that provide methodologies resulting from case studies to promote cybersecurity awareness among stakeholders. The articles included highlight the need to adopt cyber hygiene practices among healthcare professionals while accessing social media platforms, which forms an ideal test bed for the attackers to gain insight into the life of healthcare professionals. Additionally, the review also includes articles that present strategies adopted by healthcare organisations in countering the impact of social engineering attacks. The evaluation of the cybersecurity risk assessment of an organisation is another key area of study reported in the literature that recommends the organisation of European and international standards in countering social engineering attacks. Lastly, the review includes articles reporting on national case studies with an overview of the economic and societal impact of service disruptions encountered due to cyberattacks. One of the limitations of the review is the subjective ranking of the authors associated to the relevance of literature to each of the research questions identified. We also acknowledge the limited amount of literature that focuses on human factors of cybersecurity in health care in general; therefore, the search queries were formulated using well-established cybersecurity related topics categorised according to the threats, risk assessment and organisational strategies reported in the literature.

摘要

网络安全在采用数字技术提高患者护理质量方面,对于医疗服务提供者来说越来越成为一个突出的问题。最近关于网络攻击的报告,如勒索软件和 WannaCry,已经使人们认识到这些攻击对医疗保健的破坏性。除了针对信息技术 (IT) 基础设施漏洞的网络攻击之外,还出现了一种新的网络攻击形式,旨在利用人为漏洞;此类攻击被归类为社会工程攻击。随着针对医院和临床环境的攻击频率和创意的增加,这些攻击旨在造成服务中断,因此强烈需要研究医疗机构为员工提供的意识计划和培训活动的水平。 本系统评价的目的是确定常见的因素,这些因素会影响医疗保健组织的网络安全态势,这些因素源于对医疗保健网络威胁的忽视。系统评价旨在整合当前报告的关于导致安全漏洞的人为行为的文献,这些安全漏洞减轻了医疗保健组织采用的网络防御策略。此外,本文还回顾了实施的组织风险评估方法和为加强网络安全而采用的政策。 网络安全在医疗保健和临床环境中的主题引起了几位研究人员的兴趣,产生了广泛的文献。综述中文章的纳入标准源于确定的五个研究问题的范围。为此,我们在三个存储库中进行了七次搜索查询,即 (i) PubMed/MED-LINE;(ii) 护理和联合健康文献累积索引 (CINAHL);和 (iii) Web of Science (WoS),使用与网络安全意识、培训、组织风险评估方法、政策和建议相关的关键字作为医疗保健中的对策。这些都限制在过去 12 年左右。 共选择了 70 篇文章纳入综述,其中涉及医疗保健和临床环境中采用的网络安全措施的复杂性。综述中包含的文章强调了网络安全威胁的演变性质,这些威胁源于利用 IT 基础设施到更高级别的攻击,旨在利用人为漏洞。网络钓鱼攻击威胁的文献不断增加,证明了社会工程攻击的威胁越来越大。作为一种对策,通过综述,我们确定了一些文章,这些文章提供了从案例研究中得出的方法,以提高利益相关者的网络安全意识。文章强调了医疗保健专业人员在访问社交媒体平台时需要采取网络卫生实践,这是攻击者了解医疗保健专业人员生活的理想测试平台。此外,该综述还包括介绍医疗机构在应对社会工程攻击影响方面所采用的策略的文章。组织网络安全风险评估的评估是文献中报告的另一个关键研究领域,该评估建议在对抗社会工程攻击方面采用欧洲和国际标准。最后,该综述包括报告国家案例研究的文章,概述了由于网络攻击而导致的服务中断对经济和社会的影响。 综述的一个局限性是作者对与每个确定的研究问题相关的文献相关性的主观排名。我们还承认一般来说,关于医疗保健中网络安全人为因素的文献数量有限;因此,搜索查询是使用根据文献中报告的威胁、风险评估和组织策略分类的成熟的网络安全相关主题制定的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fae/8348467/184f12932834/sensors-21-05119-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验