在两个人格评定量表上对病前人格的自评与知情者评定进行比较。
Comparison of self-ratings with informant-ratings of pre-morbid personality on two personality rating scales.
作者信息
Dodwell D
机构信息
University Department of Neurology, Manchester Royal Infirmary.
出版信息
Psychol Med. 1988 May;18(2):495-501. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700008035.
In a study of pre-morbid personality in 56 head-injured subjects, subjects' self-ratings of pre-morbid personality were compared with informants' ratings of the subjects' pre-morbid personality on two personality questionnaires (the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) and the Marke-Nyman Temperament Scale (MNTS]. Correlations between self-ratings and informant-ratings were positive and significant for all three MNTS and for EPI Extraversion and Lie scales, but not for EPI Neuroticism, where the lack of subject-informant correlation was attributed to contamination of the self-rating of the trait measure by current abnormalities of mental state. Further analyses supported previous evidence that the MNTS 'Validity' scale may predict the development of psychiatric symptoms.
在一项针对56名头部受伤受试者病前人格的研究中，通过两份人格问卷（艾森克人格问卷（EPI）和马克-尼曼气质量表（MNTS）），将受试者对病前人格的自我评分与知情者对受试者病前人格的评分进行了比较。对于所有三个MNTS量表以及EPI外向性和说谎量表，自我评分与知情者评分之间的相关性呈正向且显著，但对于EPI神经质量表则不然，该特质测量的自我评分与知情者评分缺乏相关性被归因于当前精神状态异常对其造成的干扰。进一步的分析支持了先前的证据，即MNTS“效度”量表可能预测精神症状的发展。
Zotero 插件