Hojjati Fateme, Afjei Mohammad Hosein, Ebrahimi Takamjani Ismail, Rayegani Seyed Mansour, Sarrafzadeh Javad, Raeissadat Seyed Ahmad, Payami Sara
Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Physical medicine & rehabilitation research center, Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Fall;11(Suppl 1):S73-S79. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.S12. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment. Various treatments have been suggested for CTS and there is no consensus on their superiority and the order of their use. Laser therapy is a non-invasive treatment method for many musculoskeletal diseases, including CTS. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of high-power lasers (HPLs) and low-power lasers (LPLs) on pain severity, function, pinch strength, and nerve conduction study findings in patients aged 30-50 years with mild or moderate CTS. This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The study population included 45 patients aged 30-50 years who came to the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic of Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital and mild or moderate CTS was confirmed for them. Patients were randomly assigned to control, LPL therapy, and HPL therapy groups. Pain, function, pinch strength, and nerve conduction study findings were recorded in all groups before, immediately and 12 weeks after the treatment. All data were compared using SPSS version 21. All groups showed improvement regarding pain, function, and pinch strength. Laser therapy showed significantly better results compared to a wrist splint, but no significant difference was seen between high-power and LPL therapy groups. Nerve conduction evaluation findings did not reveal any significant difference. Both the wrist splint and laser therapy can improve the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. HPL therapy showed better results, although not significantly different from LPL therapy.
腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的周围神经卡压症。针对CTS已提出了各种治疗方法,但对于它们的优越性及其使用顺序尚无共识。激光疗法是包括CTS在内的许多肌肉骨骼疾病的一种非侵入性治疗方法。本研究旨在确定并比较高功率激光(HPL)和低功率激光(LPL)对30至50岁轻度或中度CTS患者疼痛严重程度、功能、捏力和神经传导研究结果的影响。这是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲临床试验。研究人群包括45名年龄在30至50岁之间的患者,他们前往塔吉里什烈士医院物理医学与康复诊所就诊,并被确诊为轻度或中度CTS。患者被随机分配到对照组、LPL治疗组和HPL治疗组。在治疗前、治疗后即刻和治疗后12周记录所有组的疼痛、功能、捏力和神经传导研究结果。所有数据使用SPSS 21版进行比较。所有组在疼痛、功能和捏力方面均有改善。与腕部夹板相比,激光疗法显示出明显更好的效果,但高功率和LPL治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。神经传导评估结果未显示任何显著差异。腕部夹板和激光疗法均可改善腕管综合征的症状。HPL疗法显示出更好的效果,尽管与LPL疗法无显著差异。