Rayegani Seyed Mansoor, Moradi-Joo Mohammad, Raeissadat Seyed Ahmad, Bahrami Mohammad Hasan, Seyed-Nezhad Maryam, Heidari Saeed
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
National Center for Health Insurance Research, Iran Health Insurance Organization, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(Suppl 1):S82-S89. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.S15. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common type of peripheral entrapment neuropathy that occurs in the wrist area in a space called the carpal tunnel. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and ultrasound are among the most common methods of physical modalities for treating CTS; the effectiveness of these 2 methods and the superiority of one over the other are not agreed among experts. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis study, the most important databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Science Direct, Trip medical database and Google Scholar were searched using appropriate keywords and specific strategies without time limitation to collect data. The collected data was analyzed using the meta-analytic method and the random-effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was examined using I . The data were analyzed using Review Manager Software. From among 108 related studies, 49 cases were entered for the first stage. After the final examination, 6 studies were selected for meta-analysis. The total number of patients in these 6 studies was 403; 204 subjects were in the LLLT group and 199 subjects were in the ultrasound group. The results of the meta-analyses showed that there was no significant difference between these 2 therapeutic methods in terms of pain relief, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS), motor latency, sensory latency, hand grip strength, and motor amplitude. Based on the meta-analyses, there was no significant difference between the 2 LLLT and ultrasound methods; in other words, they had similar effectiveness in improving the condition of patients with CTS. However, the authors believe that arriving at conclusions in this area requires high-quality and large size studies.
腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的周围神经卡压性神经病,发生在腕部一个称为腕管的区域。低强度激光疗法(LLLT)和超声是治疗CTS最常见的物理治疗方法;这两种方法的有效性以及一种方法相对于另一种方法的优越性在专家之间尚未达成共识。在本系统评价和荟萃分析研究中,使用适当的关键词和特定策略,在无时间限制的情况下搜索了包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、综述与传播中心、Science Direct、Trip医学数据库和谷歌学术在内的最重要数据库,以收集数据。使用荟萃分析方法和随机效应模型对收集到的数据进行分析。使用I检验研究之间的异质性。使用Review Manager软件对数据进行分析。在108项相关研究中,49项进入第一阶段。经过最终审查,选择了6项研究进行荟萃分析。这6项研究中的患者总数为403例;LLLT组有204名受试者,超声组有199名受试者。荟萃分析结果表明,在缓解疼痛、症状严重程度量表(SSS)、功能状态量表(FSS)、运动潜伏期、感觉潜伏期、握力和运动幅度方面,这两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异。基于荟萃分析,LLLT和超声这两种方法之间没有显著差异;换句话说,它们在改善CTS患者病情方面具有相似的有效性。然而,作者认为在该领域得出结论需要高质量和大样本量的研究。