• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Multi-vessel Versus Culprit-vessel-only PCI for STEMI: Where Does the Jury Stand?

作者信息

Almas Talal, Akram Ayesha, Ehtesham Maryam, Ahmed Reema, Khedro Tarek, Malik Uzair, Alshaikh Lamees, Alshaikh Lina, Sattar Yasar, Hassan Virk Hafeez Ul

机构信息

RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 24;65:102343. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102343. eCollection 2021 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102343
PMID:33996070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100091/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Multi-vessel Versus Culprit-vessel-only PCI for STEMI: Where Does the Jury Stand?ST段抬高型心肌梗死的多支血管与仅罪犯血管PCI治疗：目前的定论是什么？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Apr 24;65:102343. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102343. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多血管病变和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多血管病变的比较：一项基于成对和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.046.
3
Multi-vessel versus culprit-vessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.多支血管病变与罪犯血管病变及分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在多支血管病变的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(8):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Culprit vessel PCI versus traditional cath and PCI for STEMI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死罪犯血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与传统心导管检查及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 May;20(5):224-8.
5
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
6
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.多支血管病变与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病罪犯血管血运重建的比较：随机试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1571-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.055.
7
Multi-vessel stenting during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. A single-center experience.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的多支血管支架置入术：单中心经验
Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 Jan;97(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0570-4. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
8
Culprit vessel only versus "one-week" staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.仅针对罪犯血管与“一周”分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支血管病变的比较
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 May;12(3):226-31. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.03.001.
9
Prognosis of STEMI Patients with Multi-Vessel Disease Undergoing Culprit-Only PCI without Significant Residual Ischemia on Non-Invasive Stress Testing.接受仅针对罪犯血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）且无创负荷试验无显著残余缺血的多支血管病变ST段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）患者的预后
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0138474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138474. eCollection 2015.
10
Multivessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Where Do We Stand After The COMPLETE Trial?多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死：在 COMPLETE 试验之后我们处于什么位置？
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jul 25;22(9):97. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01340-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-Analysis of Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 15;135:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
2
Multivessel or Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Real-World Evidence in Support of CULPRIT-SHOCK.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者多支血管或仅罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：支持CULPRIT-SHOCK研究的真实世界证据
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1280-1283. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3400.
3
Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Multivessel PCI Versus Culprit Artery Only PCI in STEMI Without Cardiogenic Shock.多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗非心原性休克 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Mar;46(3):100646. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100646. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
4
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.多支血管病变与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病罪犯血管血运重建的比较：随机试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1571-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.055.
5
Multivessel versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行多支血管与罪犯血管血运重建的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Nov;109(11):1381-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01637-6. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
6
Meta-Analysis Comparing Complete Versus Infarct-Related Artery Revascularization in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者行完全血运重建与罪犯相关动脉血运重建的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;125(4):513-520. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Timing of Staged Nonculprit Artery Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: COMPLETE Trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者分期非罪犯血管血运重建的时机：COMPLETE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 3;74(22):2713-2723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051.
8
Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.COMPLETE 试验的设计和原理：比较完全经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与罪犯血管-only 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的随机、对照有效性研究。
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Optimized Treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.优化 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗。
Circ Res. 2019 Jul 5;125(2):245-258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315344. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Metaanalysis of Multivessel vs Culprit Artery Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的Meta分析
Ochsner J. 2019 Summer;19(2):107-115. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0033.