Unterrainer Marcus, Ruf Viktoria, von Rohr Katharina, Suchorska Bogdana, Mittlmeier Lena Maria, Beyer Leonie, Brendel Matthias, Wenter Vera, Kunz Wolfgang G, Bartenstein Peter, Herms Jochen, Niyazi Maximilian, Tonn Jörg C, Albert Nathalie Lisa
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 27;11:645316. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.645316. eCollection 2021.
The mutation of the 'telomerase reverse transcriptase gene promoter' (TERTp) has been identified as an important factor for individual prognostication and tumorigenesis and will be implemented in upcoming glioma classifications. Uptake characteristics on dynamic F-FET PET have been shown to serve as additional imaging biomarker for prognosis. However, data on the correlation of TERTp-mutational status and amino acid uptake on dynamic F-FET PET are missing. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether static and dynamic F-FET PET parameters are associated with the TERTp-mutational status in de-novo -wildtype glioblastoma and whether a TERTp-mutation can be predicted by dynamic F-FET PET.
Patients with de-novo -wildtype glioblastoma, WHO grade IV, available TERTp-mutational status and dynamic F-FET PET scan prior to any therapy were included. Here, established clinical parameters maximal and mean tumor-to-background-ratios (TBR/TBR), the biological-tumor-volume (BTV) and minimal-time-to-peak (TTP) on dynamic PET were analyzed and correlated with the TERTp-mutational status.
One hundred -wildtype glioblastoma patients were evaluated; 85/100 of the analyzed tumors showed a TERTp-mutation (C228T or C250T), 15/100 were classified as TERTp-wildtype. None of the static PET parameters was associated with the TERTp-mutational status (median TBR 3.41 vs. 3.32 (p=0.362), TBR 2.09 vs. 2.02 (p=0.349) and BTV 26.1 vs. 22.4 ml (p=0.377)). Also, the dynamic PET parameter TTP did not differ in both groups (12.5 vs. 12.5 min, p=0.411). Within the TERTp-mutant subgroups (i.e., C228T (n=23) & C250T (n=62)), the median TBR (3.33 vs. 3.69, p=0.095), TBR (2.08 vs. 2.09, p=0.352), BTV (25.4 vs. 30.0 ml, p=0.130) and TTP (12.5 vs. 12.5 min, p=0.190) were comparable, too.
Uptake characteristics on dynamic F-FET PET are not associated with the TERTp-mutational status in glioblastoma However, as both, dynamic F-FET PET parameters as well as the TERTp-mutation status are well-known prognostic biomarkers, future studies should investigate the complementary and independent prognostic value of both factors in order to further stratify patients into risk groups.
“端粒酶逆转录酶基因启动子”(TERTp)突变已被确定为个体预后和肿瘤发生的重要因素,并将应用于即将推出的胶质瘤分类中。动态F-FET PET的摄取特征已被证明可作为预后的额外影像生物标志物。然而,关于TERTp突变状态与动态F-FET PET上氨基酸摄取的相关性的数据尚缺。因此,我们旨在分析在初发野生型胶质母细胞瘤中,静态和动态F-FET PET参数是否与TERTp突变状态相关,以及动态F-FET PET能否预测TERTp突变。
纳入初发野生型WHO Ⅳ级胶质母细胞瘤患者,这些患者有可用的TERTp突变状态且在任何治疗前进行了动态F-FET PET扫描。在此,分析了动态PET上既定的临床参数最大和平均肿瘤与背景比值(TBR/TBR)、生物肿瘤体积(BTV)和最小达峰时间(TTP),并将其与TERTp突变状态进行相关性分析。
评估了100例野生型胶质母细胞瘤患者;100例分析的肿瘤中85例显示TERTp突变(C228T或C250T),15例分类为TERTp野生型。没有静态PET参数与TERTp突变状态相关(中位TBR 3.41对3.32(p = 0.362),TBR 2.09对2.02(p = 0.349),BTV 26.1对22.4 ml(p = 0.377))。同样,动态PET参数TTP在两组中也无差异(12.5对12.5分钟,p = 0.411)。在TERTp突变亚组(即C228T(n = 23)和C250T(n = 62))中,中位TBR(3.33对3.69,p = 0.095)、TBR(2.08对2.09,p = 0.352)、BTV(25.4对30.0 ml,p = 0.130)和TTP(12.5对12.5分钟,p = 0.190)也具有可比性。
动态F-FET PET的摄取特征与胶质母细胞瘤的TERTp突变状态无关。然而,由于动态F-FET PET参数和TERTp突变状态都是众所周知的预后生物标志物,未来的研究应调查这两个因素的互补和独立预后价值,以便进一步将患者分层为风险组。