• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新冠病毒疾病检测分流工具,用于预测阴性结果并减轻大流行期间医疗系统的检测负担。

A COVID-19 Test Triage Tool, Predicting Negative Results and Reducing the Testing Burden on Healthcare Systems During a Pandemic.

作者信息

Lundon Dara J, Kelly Brian D, Nair Sujit, Bolton Damien M, Patel Gopi, Reich David, Tewari Ashutosh

机构信息

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospitals, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 29;8:563465. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.563465. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.563465
PMID:33996839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8116585/
Abstract

Detecting and isolating cases of COVID-19 are amongst the key elements listed by the WHO to reduce transmission. This approach has been reported to reduce those symptomatic with COVID-19 in the population by over 90%. Testing is part of a strategy that will save lives. Testing everyone maybe ideal, but it is not practical. A risk tool based on patient demographics and clinical parameters has the potential to help identify patients most likely to test negative for SARS-CoV-2. If effective it could be used to aide clinical decision making and reduce the testing burden. At the time of this analysis, a total of 9,516 patients with symptoms suggestive of Covid-19, were assessed and tested at Mount Sinai Institutions in New York. Patient demographics, clinical parameters and test results were collected. A robust prediction pipeline was used to develop a risk tool to predict the likelihood of a positive test for Covid-19. The risk tool was analyzed in a holdout dataset from the cohort and its discriminative ability, calibration and net benefit assessed. Over 48% of those tested in this cohort, had a positive result. The derived model had an AUC of 0.77, provided reliable risk prediction, and demonstrated a superior net benefit than a strategy of testing everybody. When a risk cut-off of 70% was applied, the model had a negative predictive value of 96%. Such a tool could be used to help aide but not replace clinical decision making and conserve vital resources needed to effectively tackle this pandemic.

摘要

检测和隔离新冠病毒病例是世界卫生组织列出的减少传播的关键要素之一。据报道,这种方法可使人群中出现新冠病毒症状的人数减少90%以上。检测是一项拯救生命的战略的一部分。对每个人进行检测可能是理想的,但并不实际。一种基于患者人口统计学和临床参数的风险工具有可能帮助识别最有可能新冠病毒检测呈阴性的患者。如果有效,它可用于辅助临床决策并减轻检测负担。在进行这项分析时,纽约西奈山医院共评估并检测了9516名有新冠病毒症状的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学、临床参数和检测结果。使用强大的预测流程开发了一种风险工具,以预测新冠病毒检测呈阳性的可能性。在该队列的一个验证数据集中对该风险工具进行了分析,并评估了其区分能力、校准和净效益。该队列中超过48%的检测者结果呈阳性。所推导的模型曲线下面积为0.77,提供了可靠的风险预测,并且显示出比检测每个人的策略更高的净效益。当应用70%的风险临界值时,该模型的阴性预测值为96%。这样一种工具可用于辅助但不能取代临床决策,并节省有效应对这一疫情所需的重要资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f88/8116585/4b26456f2f5c/fmed-08-563465-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f88/8116585/e129bee14f0c/fmed-08-563465-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f88/8116585/4b26456f2f5c/fmed-08-563465-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f88/8116585/e129bee14f0c/fmed-08-563465-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f88/8116585/4b26456f2f5c/fmed-08-563465-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
A COVID-19 Test Triage Tool, Predicting Negative Results and Reducing the Testing Burden on Healthcare Systems During a Pandemic.一种新冠病毒疾病检测分流工具,用于预测阴性结果并减轻大流行期间医疗系统的检测负担。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 29;8:563465. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.563465. eCollection 2021.
2
A Decision Aide for the Risk Stratification of GU Cancer Patients at Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19 Related Hospitalization, Intubation, and Mortality.一种用于对有感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关住院、插管和死亡风险的泌尿生殖系统癌症患者进行风险分层的决策辅助工具。
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 30;9(9):2799. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092799.
3
Multi-tiered screening and diagnosis strategy for COVID-19: a model for sustainable testing capacity in response to pandemic.新冠病毒多层次筛查与诊断策略:应对大流行的可持续检测能力模式。
Ann Med. 2020 Aug;52(5):207-214. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1763449. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Development and validation of a simple risk score for diagnosing COVID-19 in the emergency room.开发和验证一种用于急诊科诊断 COVID-19 的简单风险评分。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Nov 13;148:e273. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002769.
5
Could masks curtail the post-lockdown resurgence of COVID-19 in the US?口罩能否遏制美国疫情封锁解除后的反弹?
Math Biosci. 2020 Nov;329:108452. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108452. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
6
The risk of over-diagnosis in serological testing. Implications for communications strategies.血清学检测的过度诊断风险。对沟通策略的影响。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):184-192. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.117.
7
Testing of Patients and Support Persons for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Before Scheduled Deliveries.对计划分娩前的患者和支持人员进行 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染检测。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):283-287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003985.
8
Individualizing Risk Prediction for Positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing: Results From 11,672 Patients.个体化新型冠状病毒肺炎检测阳性风险预测:来自 11672 例患者的结果。
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1364-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.580. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.2020年新冠疫情期间,在意大利北部一家大型教学医院,将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型IgG/IgM快速检测作为住院患者和医护人员的诊断工具。
New Microbiol. 2020 Oct;43(4):161-165. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
Association of Maternal Perinatal SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Neonatal Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州 COVID-19 大流行期间产妇围生期 SARS-CoV-2 感染与新生儿结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7523.

引用本文的文献

1
To PCR or not? The impact of shifting policy from PCR to rapid antigen tests to diagnose COVID-19 during the omicron epidemic: a nationwide surveillance study.是否进行 PCR 检测?在奥密克戎疫情期间,将诊断 COVID-19 的检测策略从 PCR 检测转变为快速抗原检测的影响:一项全国性监测研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1148637. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1148637. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的快速即时护理抗原检测和基于分子的检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.
2
Covid-19: identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village.新冠疫情:识别并隔离无症状感染者助力意大利村庄消灭病毒。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 23;368:m1165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1165.
3
Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020.
估算 2020 年日本横滨钻石公主号游轮上的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例的无症状比例。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180.
4
Priorities for the US Health Community Responding to COVID-19.美国卫生界应对新冠疫情的优先事项。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1343-1344. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3413.
5
Regulation of predictive analytics in medicine.医学中预测分析的监管。
Science. 2019 Feb 22;363(6429):810-812. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0029.
6
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.现代筛查数字化乳腺摄影的国家性能基准:来自乳腺癌监测联盟的更新
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):49-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Factors that lead to changes in sexual behaviours after a negative HIV test: protocol for a prospective cohort study in Kinshasa.HIV检测结果呈阴性后导致性行为改变的因素:金沙萨一项前瞻性队列研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 20;16:606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3285-5.
8
Prostate cancer risk assessment tools in an unscreened population.未筛查人群中的前列腺癌风险评估工具
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):827-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1365-7. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
9
Behavioral adjustment to avian flu in Europe during spring 2006: the roles of knowledge and proximity to risk.2006 年春季欧洲对禽流感的行为调整:知识和风险接近度的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(8):1362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
10
Is the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) superior to clinician judgement in detecting critical illness in the pre-hospital environment?改良早期预警评分(MEWS)是否优于临床医生的判断,用于在院前环境中检测危重病?
Resuscitation. 2012 May;83(5):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Jan 14.