Suppr超能文献

与池塘供水相比,在牧场上饲养的肉牛使用水槽供水时表现更佳。

Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond.

作者信息

Bica Gabriela Schenato, Pinheiro Machado Filho Luiz Carlos, Teixeira Dayane Lemos

机构信息

Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 29;8:616904. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.616904. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The behavior and performance of steers on pasture regarding water availability in troughs or in ponds were compared. Eight paddocks were randomly allocated to one treatment: POND (~30 m of diameter) or TROUGH (water trough, 120 cm diameter and 60 cm high and 500 L capacity). Eight groups of six beef steers were randomly assigned to one of the paddocks. The first 10 days were considered for animal habituation. Animals were individually weighed (days 0, 30, 60, and 90). Beginning in the day after each weighing on days 30 (Month 1), 60 (Month 2), and 90 (Month 3), behavior and animal distribution in the paddock were recorded by direct visual observation in three periods of 4 consecutive days. Water temperature and fecal and herbage DM were also recorded in these periods. Water intake was measured during 16 random days in the troughs. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models, with treatment and period as fixed effects. TROUGH steers gained more weight (0.44 vs. 0.34 kg/day/animal; ≤ 0.007) during the experiment and were heavier than the others at the end of the study ( ≤ 0.05). POND steers spent more time drinking water, but TROUGH steers increased the number of drinking events throughout the study ( ≤ 0.05), suggesting an adaptation for the new type of water source. Both treatments increased grazing time throughout the study, but not ruminating time ( ≤ 0.05). Walking time differed between treatments in all periods of behavior observation ( ≤ 0.05). Events of animal licking and ingesting salt of POND steers reduced throughout the study ( ≤ 0.05). The number of drinking events of TROUGH steers increased throughout the study, and drinking events were longer for POND steers than TROUGH steers ( ≤ 0.05). TROUGH steers spent more time on pasture on Month 2 ( ≤ 0.05). Period collection did not affect the water intake of TROUGH treatment ( > 0.05). This study demonstrates that water available in troughs rather than ponds for steers on pasture has positive effects on their weight gain and affects cattle behavior.

摘要

比较了牧场中阉牛在水槽或池塘获取水源情况下的行为和表现。八个围场被随机分配到一种处理方式:池塘(直径约30米)或水槽(直径120厘米、高60厘米、容量500升的水槽)。八组每组六头肉用阉牛被随机分配到其中一个围场。前10天用于让动物适应环境。对动物进行个体称重(第0、30、60和90天)。从第30天(第1个月)、60天(第2个月)和90天(第3个月)每次称重后的次日开始,通过连续4天的三个时间段直接目视观察记录围场内的行为和动物分布情况。在这些时间段还记录了水温、粪便和牧草干物质含量。在水槽中随机选取16天测量饮水量。使用广义线性混合模型分析数据,将处理方式和时间段作为固定效应。在实验期间,水槽组阉牛增重更多(0.44千克/天/头对0.34千克/天/头;P≤0.007),并且在研究结束时比其他组更重(P≤0.05)。池塘组阉牛饮水时间更长,但水槽组阉牛在整个研究过程中饮水次数增加(P≤0.05),这表明对新型水源的适应。在整个研究过程中,两种处理方式都增加了放牧时间,但反刍时间没有增加(P≤0.05)。在行为观察的所有时间段,不同处理方式下的行走时间存在差异(P≤0.05)。在整个研究过程中,池塘组阉牛舔舐和摄入盐分的次数减少(P≤0.05)。水槽组阉牛的饮水次数在整个研究过程中增加,并且池塘组阉牛的饮水事件比水槽组更长(P≤0.05)。水槽组阉牛在第2个月在牧场上花费的时间更多(P≤0.05)。时间段收集对水槽处理方式的饮水量没有影响(P>0.05)。本研究表明,牧场中阉牛使用水槽而非池塘中的水对其体重增加有积极影响,并会影响牛的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e66/8116948/2c4732208bf0/fvets-08-616904-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 29;8:616904. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.616904. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of water trough type on the drinking behaviour of pasture-based beef heifers.
Animal. 2010 Jan;4(1):116-21. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990930.
6
Effect of supplements on growth and forage intake by stocker steers grazing wheat pasture.
J Anim Sci. 2000 Jun;78(6):1625-35. doi: 10.2527/2000.7861625x.
7
Effects of beef production system on animal performance and carcass characteristics.
J Anim Sci. 2014 Dec;92(12):5727-38. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7639. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Welfare of beef cattle.
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 25;23(7):e9518. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Voisin Rational Grazing as a Sustainable Alternative for Livestock Production.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;11(12):3494. doi: 10.3390/ani11123494.

本文引用的文献

1
Hot weather increases competition between dairy cows at the drinker.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3447-3458. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17456. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
The Environmental Impact of Cattle Access to Watercourses: A Review.
J Environ Qual. 2019 Mar;48(2):340-351. doi: 10.2134/jeq2018.04.0167.
3
Drinking frequency effects on the performance of cattle: a systematic review.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2017 Dec;101(6):1076-1092. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12640. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
4
Effect of water trough type on the drinking behaviour of pasture-based beef heifers.
Animal. 2010 Jan;4(1):116-21. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990930.
5
Effect of drinking water temperature on water intake and performance of dairy calves.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2475-80. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3723.
6
The amount of shade influences the behavior and physiology of dairy cattle.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jan;93(1):125-33. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2416.
7
Management of water quality for beef cattle.
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2007 Mar;23(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.12.002.
9
Manipulating cattle distribution with salt and water in large arid-land pastures: a GPS/GIS assessment.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Aug 27;73(4):251-262. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00148-4.
10
Effect of water restriction on feeding and metabolism in dairy cows.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Feb;280(2):R418-27. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.2.R418.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验