Dairy Science Group, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Dairy Science Group, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5454-5465. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13388. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
Grain-based concentrate (GBC) supplement is of high cost to dairy farmers as a feed source as opposed to grazed pasture. Milk production response to GBC is affected by the composition and nutritive value of the remainder of the diet, animal factors, and interactions between forage type and level of GBC. In grazing systems, dairy cattle encounter contrasting pasture states, primarily because the social structure of the herd affects the timing of when each animal accesses a paddock after milking as a result of a relatively consistent cow milking order. However, the effect of feed management, namely pasture state and GBC allocation, on dairy cattle production and behavior is unknown. We examined the effect of varying GBC allocation for dairy cattle grazing differing states of kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum, a tropical pasture species; experiment 1) and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L., a temperate pasture species; experiment 2) on dry matter intake, milk production and composition, and grazing behavior. For each experiment, 90 lactating dairy cattle were randomly allocated to 2 consistent (fresh-fresh and depleted-depleted) and 2 inconsistent (fresh-depleted and depleted-fresh pasture state treatments (defined as sequences of pasture state allocation for the morning and afternoon grazing events) and 3 GBC treatments [2.7, 5.4, and 8.1 kg of dry matter (DM)/cow per day], giving 12 treatment combinations for each experiment. The duration of each experiment was 14 d, with the first 7 d used as adaptation to treatment. In each experiment, 3 cattle were selected from each of the 12 pasture type × GBC treatment groups within the experimental herd to determine herbage intake and total DM digestibility using the n-alkanes method (n = 36). There was no interaction between kikuyu grass or ryegrass pasture state and GBC level for intake, digestibility, or milk yield or components. Dairy cattle offered fresh-fresh and depleted-fresh ryegrass produced 9% more milk yield, in line with greater pasture intakes, compared with fresh-depleted and depleted-depleted pasture states. Dairy cattle offered fresh-fresh kikuyu grass had 8% more milk yield and 14% more milk protein yield than other pastures states, but there was no effect of pasture state on milk composition. Milk yield increased with GBC level for both pasture species (∼0.7-0.8 kg of milk/kg of DM GBC) as GBC level increased from 2.5 to 5.4 kg of DM/cow per day. There was a poor response (0.3 kg of milk/kg of DM GBC), and no response, when GBC levels increased from 5.4 to 8.1 kg of DM/cow per day for kikuyu grass and ryegrass, respectively, in line with pasture DMD. Time spent grazing, lying, and ruminating were not associated with kikuyu grass pasture state, GBC, or their interaction. Despite this, there was a linear increase in grazing time in the afternoon coinciding with a linear decrease in lying and rumination time for both kikuyu grass and ryegrass pasture. Together these findings reveal the effect of pasture state and GBC allocation on dairy cattle production and behavior. Tailoring GBC allocation to the state of pasture accessed by cattle appears unwarranted, but there is an opportunity to alter the timing of pasture access to increase herd-level milk production efficiency.
谷物浓缩物(GBC)作为一种饲料来源,其成本对于奶农来说很高,而不是放牧的牧场。GBC 对牛奶产量的影响取决于饮食的其余部分的组成和营养价值、动物因素以及牧草类型和 GBC 水平之间的相互作用。在放牧系统中,奶牛会遇到截然不同的牧场状态,主要是因为牛群的社会结构会影响每头奶牛在挤奶后进入围场的时间,这是由于相对一致的奶牛挤奶顺序。然而,饲料管理的影响,即牧场状态和 GBC 分配,对奶牛的生产和行为尚不清楚。我们研究了不同状态的 kikuyu 草(Pennisetum clandestinum,一种热带牧草物种;实验 1)和一年生黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum L.,一种温带牧草物种;实验 2)的 GBC 分配对放牧奶牛的干物质摄入量、牛奶产量和组成以及放牧行为的影响。对于每个实验,90 头泌乳奶牛被随机分配到 2 个一致(新鲜-新鲜和枯竭-枯竭)和 2 个不一致(新鲜-枯竭和枯竭-新鲜牧场状态处理(定义为上午和下午放牧事件的牧场状态分配序列)和 3 个 GBC 处理[2.7、5.4 和 8.1 公斤干物质(DM)/奶牛/天],每个实验有 12 种处理组合。每个实验的持续时间为 14 天,前 7 天用于适应处理。在每个实验中,从实验牛群中的每个 12 个牧草类型×GBC 处理组中选择 3 头奶牛,使用 n-烷烃法(n = 36)确定牧草摄入量和总 DM 消化率。在 kikuyu 草或黑麦草牧场状态和 GBC 水平之间没有相互作用,无论是在摄入量、消化率还是在牛奶产量或成分方面。与新鲜-枯竭和枯竭-枯竭牧场状态相比,提供新鲜-新鲜和枯竭-新鲜黑麦草的奶牛的牛奶产量增加了 9%,这与牧草摄入量增加有关。提供新鲜-新鲜 kikuyu 草的奶牛的牛奶产量比其他牧场状态高 8%,牛奶蛋白产量高 14%,但牧场状态对牛奶成分没有影响。随着 GBC 水平从 2.5 增加到 5.4 公斤/天,两种牧草的牛奶产量都增加了(约 0.7-0.8 公斤/公斤 DM GBC)。对于 kikuyu 草和黑麦草,当 GBC 水平从 5.4 增加到 8.1 公斤/天/牛时,牛奶产量仅略有增加(0.3 公斤/公斤 DM GBC),没有反应,这与牧草 DMD 相符。放牧时间、躺卧时间和反刍时间与 kikuyu 草牧场状态、GBC 或它们的相互作用无关。尽管如此,在 kikuyu 草和黑麦草牧场中,下午的放牧时间呈线性增加,同时躺卧和反刍时间呈线性减少。这些发现共同揭示了牧场状态和 GBC 分配对奶牛生产和行为的影响。根据牛群所接触的牧场状态来调整 GBC 的分配似乎没有必要,但有机会改变牧场的进入时间,以提高牛群的牛奶生产效率。