Slayi Mhlangabezi, Zhou Leocadia, Njisane Yonela Zifikile
Risk and Vulnerability Science Centre, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 25;9:926140. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.926140. eCollection 2022.
Grass biomass composition and distribution patterns within the paddock as determinants of behavioral activities and animal performance of Nguni (NG) and Boran (BR) cattle post-relocation to a novel environment were examined. Ten steers of each breed aged 9 months were bought from two different farms and sent to Honeydale research facilities, where they were reared on rangelands for 12 weeks. Identification and classification of grass species were done every sampling week before introducing cattle to each paddock. Direct visual observations and durations of behavior and paddock occupancy patterns were recorded every fortnight between 0500 and 1900 h every week. Individual animal weights and body condition scores (BCS) were recorded two times per week. Location within paddocks hugely affected ( < 0.0001) the composition of the vegetation as most grass species were found everywhere on pastures, near the watering points and along fencelines. However, the distribution patterns of the grass species significantly differed at different locations. was dominant (P = 0.0014) everywhere in the pasture and along fenceline than in areas with a high density of trees. Except in shaded areas, ( = 0.0003) and ( = 0.0008) were highly abundant near the watering points, pastures, and along the fenceline. ( < 0.0001) was only prevalent everywhere on pastures except in shade areas, near the water sites, and along fenceline. In terms of palatability and ecological groups, highly palatable species ( < 0.0001) and decreasers ( = 0.0010) were more frequent everywhere in the paddocks. From Weeks 1 to 3, NG spent more time walking ( < 0.0001), while the BR showed a significant decline in grazing activities ( < 0.0001) in spite of several differences in vegetation composition. Both breeds showed a significant decline in weight gain ( < 0.0001) and body condition score ( < 0.0001) in the first 3 weeks. However, the two cattle breeds quickly compensated for their behavioral activities and weight gain, and this shows a good ability to cope with stress caused by heterogeneous environmental conditions.
研究了围栏内牧草生物量组成和分布模式对恩古尼牛(NG)和博拉纳牛(BR)迁移到新环境后的行为活动及动物生产性能的影响。从两个不同农场购买了10头9月龄的各品种阉牛,并送往霍尼代尔研究设施,在那里它们在牧场饲养12周。在将牛引入每个围栏之前,每周采样时对草种进行鉴定和分类。每周在0500至1900时之间每两周记录一次直接视觉观察结果、行为持续时间和围栏占用模式。每周记录两次个体动物体重和体况评分(BCS)。围栏内的位置对植被组成有很大影响(P<0.0001),因为大多数草种在牧场各处、靠近饮水点和围栏沿线都有发现。然而,草种的分布模式在不同位置有显著差异。在牧场各处和围栏沿线,[草种名称1]比在树木密度高的地区占优势(P = 0.0014)。除了阴凉区域,[草种名称2](P = 0.0003)和[草种名称3](P = 0.0008)在饮水点附近、牧场和围栏沿线高度丰富。[草种名称4](P<0.0001)仅在牧场各处普遍存在,除了阴凉区域、靠近水源地和围栏沿线。就适口性和生态组而言,适口性高的草种(P<0.0001)和衰退型草种(P = 0.0010)在围栏内各处更为常见。从第1周到第3周,尽管植被组成存在一些差异,但恩古尼牛花费更多时间行走(P<0.0001),而博拉纳牛的放牧活动显著下降(P<0.0001)。两个品种在前三周体重增加(P<0.0001)和体况评分(P<0.0001)均显著下降。然而,这两个牛品种很快补偿了它们的行为活动和体重增加,这表明它们有很好的能力应对由异质环境条件引起的压力。