Suppr超能文献

美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联赛女子室内排球与沙滩排球运动员的损伤流行病学及参赛时间损失情况

Injury Epidemiology and Time Lost From Participation in Women's NCAA Division I Indoor Versus Beach Volleyball Players.

作者信息

Juhan Tristan, Bolia Ioanna K, Kang Hyunwoo P, Homere Andrew, Romano Russ, Tibone James E, Gamradt Seth C, Weber Alexander E

机构信息

USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 27;9(4):23259671211004546. doi: 10.1177/23259671211004546. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beach volleyball officially became a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I sport in 2015-2016. Few studies have examined the epidemiology of injuries in indoor versus beach volleyball in NCAA Division I athletes.

PURPOSE

To compare the epidemiology of injuries and time lost from participation between female NCAA Division I athletes who participate in indoor versus beach volleyball.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Injury surveillance data (2003-2020) were obtained using an institutional database for all NCAA Division I women's beach or indoor volleyball athletes. The total injury rate was expressed per 1000 hours played. The injury rate per body site was calculated by dividing the number of injuries in each body region by the total number of injuries. The frequency of injury per body site was also expressed as number of injuries per 1000 hours of practice or number of injuries per 1000 hours of game. The injury rate (total and per body site) and time lost from participation were compared between indoor and beach volleyball athletes.

RESULTS

Participants were 161 female NCAA Division I volleyball athletes (53 beach volleyball and 108 indoor volleyball athletes). In total, 974 injuries were recorded: 170 in beach volleyball and 804 in indoor volleyball. The injury rates for beach versus indoor volleyball were 1.8 versus 5.3 injuries per 1000 hours played ( < .0001). Indoor volleyball athletes had significantly higher injury rates compared with beach volleyball players for concussion (7.5% vs 6.5%; < .0001) and knee injury (16.7% vs 7.6%; = .0004); however, the rate of abdominal muscle injury was significantly higher in beach versus indoor volleyball (11.8% vs 4.7%; = .0008). Time lost from sport participation was significantly longer in beach versus indoor volleyball for knee (24 vs 11 days; = .047), low back (25 vs 17 days; = .0009), and shoulder (52 vs 28 days; = .001) injuries.

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, injury was more likely to occur in indoor compared with beach volleyball. Sport-related concussion and knee injuries were more common in indoor volleyball, but the rate of abdominal muscle injury was higher in beach volleyball. Beach volleyball players needed longer time to recover after injuries to the knee, low back, and shoulder.

摘要

背景

沙滩排球于2015 - 2016年正式成为美国国家大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联赛项目。很少有研究调查NCAA一级联赛运动员在室内排球和沙滩排球运动中损伤的流行病学情况。

目的

比较参加室内排球和沙滩排球的NCAA一级联赛女运动员的损伤流行病学情况以及因伤缺赛时间。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

利用一个机构数据库获取了所有NCAA一级联赛女子沙滩或室内排球运动员的损伤监测数据(2003 - 2020年)。总损伤率以每1000小时比赛时间的损伤数来表示。每个身体部位的损伤率通过将每个身体区域的损伤数除以总损伤数来计算。每个身体部位的损伤频率也表示为每1000小时训练的损伤数或每1000小时比赛的损伤数。比较了室内和沙滩排球运动员的损伤率(总损伤率和每个身体部位的损伤率)以及因伤缺赛时间。

结果

参与者为161名NCAA一级联赛女子排球运动员(53名沙滩排球运动员和108名室内排球运动员)。总共记录了974例损伤:沙滩排球170例,室内排球804例。沙滩排球和室内排球每1000小时比赛时间的损伤率分别为1.8例和5.3例(P < 0.0001)。与沙滩排球运动员相比,室内排球运动员在脑震荡(7.5%对6.5%;P < 0.0001)和膝关节损伤(16.7%对7.6%;P = 0.0004)方面的损伤率显著更高;然而,沙滩排球中腹部肌肉损伤的发生率显著高于室内排球(11.8%对4.7%;P = 0.0008)。沙滩排球运动员因膝关节损伤(24天对11天;P = 0.047)、下背部损伤(25天对17天;P = 0.0009)和肩部损伤(52天对28天;P = 0.001)而缺赛的时间显著长于室内排球运动员。

结论

基于本研究,与沙滩排球相比,室内排球运动中更易发生损伤。与运动相关的脑震荡和膝关节损伤在室内排球中更常见,但沙滩排球中腹部肌肉损伤的发生率更高。沙滩排球运动员在膝关节、下背部和肩部受伤后需要更长时间恢复。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验