Nishii Nobuhiro, Noda Takashi, Nitta Takashi, Aizawa Yoshifusa, Ohe Tohru, Kurita Takashi
Department of Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Apr 26;34:100779. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100779. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Various risk factors for the first inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy event have been reported, including a history of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), younger age, and multiple zones. Nonetheless, which factors are concordant with real-world data has not been clarified, and risk factors for the second inappropriate ICD therapy event have not been well examined. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for the first and second inappropriate ICD therapy events.
We conducted a post-hoc secondary analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective observational study (the Nippon Storm Study) designed to clarify the risk factors for electrical storm.
The analysis included data from 1549 patients who received ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). Over a median follow-up of 28 months, 293 inappropriate ICD therapy events occurred in 153 (10.0%) patients. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the risk factors for the first inappropriate ICD therapy event were younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.986; p = 0.028), AF/AFL (HR, 2.324; p = 0.002), ICD without CRT implantation (HR, 2.377; p = 0.004), and multiple zones (HR, 1.852; p = 0.010). "No-intervention" after the first inappropriate ICD therapy event was the sole risk factor for the second inappropriate ICD therapy event.
Risk factors for the first inappropriate ICD therapy event were similar to those previously reported. Immediate intervention after the first inappropriate ICD therapy event could reduce the risk of the second inappropriate event.
已有报道称首次不恰当植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗事件存在多种风险因素,包括心房颤动/心房扑动(AF/AFL)病史、年轻以及多个区域。然而,哪些因素与真实世界数据相符尚未明确,且第二次不恰当ICD治疗事件的风险因素尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在明确首次和第二次不恰当ICD治疗事件的风险因素。
我们对一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究(日本风暴研究)的数据进行了事后二次分析,该研究旨在明确电风暴的风险因素。
分析纳入了1549例接受ICD或心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的患者的数据。在中位随访28个月期间,153例(10.0%)患者发生了293次不恰当ICD治疗事件。多因素Cox回归分析显示,首次不恰当ICD治疗事件的风险因素包括年轻(风险比[HR],0.986;p = 0.028)、AF/AFL(HR,2.324;p = 0.002)、未植入CRT的ICD(HR,2.377;p = 0.004)以及多个区域(HR,1.852;p = 0.010)。首次不恰当ICD治疗事件后的“不干预”是第二次不恰当ICD治疗事件的唯一风险因素。
首次不恰当ICD治疗事件的风险因素与先前报道的相似。首次不恰当ICD治疗事件后立即进行干预可降低第二次不恰当事件的风险。