Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器患者首次及反复ICD电击治疗的发生率及危险因素。

Incidence and risk factors for first and recurrent ICD shock therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

作者信息

Frodi Diana My, Diederichsen Søren Zöga, Xing Lucas Yixi, Spona Daniel Camillo, Jacobsen Peter Karl, Risum Niels, Svendsen Jesper Hastrup

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):125-139. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01873-0. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical treatment and outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients incentivize a need for improved candidate selection and identification of risk factors for ICD therapy. We examined contemporary rates of and risk factors for ICD therapy.

METHODS

Patients with ICD for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP), implanted between January 2010 and December 2020, were followed for appropriate and inappropriate incident and recurrent shock.

RESULTS

Overall, 2998 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 12.7 years, 20% female, 73% ICD carriers, and 47.1% SP) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-7.4) years. A total of 426/2998 (14.2%) patients had shock; 364/2998 (12.1%) had appropriate and 82/2998 (2.7%) inappropriate shock, with annualized event rates of 2.34 (2.11-2.59) and 0.49 (0.39-0.61) per 100 person-years, respectively. Of those with shock, 133/364 (36.5%) experienced recurrent appropriate shock and 8/364 (2.2%) received recurrent inappropriate shock, with event rates of 10.57 (8.85-12.53) and 0.46 (0.20-0.92), respectively. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with a reduced risk of incident appropriate shock (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.52; 0.91]). Of other variables, only revascularization status was associated with recurrent appropriate shock in PP, and CRT-D with recurrent appropriate shock in the overall cohort.

CONCLUSION

One in eight ICD recipients received appropriate shock 2-7 years after guideline-directed implantation. More than one-third of patients with a first shock experienced recurrent shock. Few clinical variables showed potential in predicting shocks, illustrating a need for more advanced tools to select candidates for implantation.

摘要

背景

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)接受者的医疗进展和治疗效果促使人们需要改进候选者选择方法并识别ICD治疗的危险因素。我们研究了ICD治疗的当代发生率及危险因素。

方法

对2010年1月至2020年12月期间植入ICD进行一级预防(PP)或二级预防(SP)的患者进行随访,观察适当和不适当的首次及复发电击情况。

结果

总共分析了2998例患者(平均年龄61.8±12.7岁,20%为女性,73%为ICD携带者,47.1%为二级预防),中位随访时间为4.3(四分位间距(IQR)2.1 - 7.4)年。共有426/2998(14.2%)例患者发生电击;364/2998(12.1%)例为适当电击,82/2998(2.7%)例为不适当电击,年化事件发生率分别为每100人年2.34(2.11 - 2.59)和0.49(0.39 - 0.61)。在发生电击的患者中,133/364(36.5%)经历了复发的适当电击,8/364(2.2%)接受了复发的不适当电击,事件发生率分别为10.57(8.85 - 12.53)和0.46(0.20 - 0.92)。在多变量分析中,女性发生首次适当电击的风险降低(风险比0.69 [95%置信区间0.52;0.91])。在其他变量中,仅血运重建状态与一级预防患者复发适当电击相关,而心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT - D)与总体队列中复发适当电击相关。

结论

八分之一的ICD接受者在指南指导植入后2至7年接受了适当电击。超过三分之一首次发生电击的患者经历了复发电击。很少有临床变量显示出预测电击的潜力,这表明需要更先进的工具来选择植入候选者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f9f/11832632/a59ed4d10011/10840_2024_1873_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验