腹部肿瘤大手术后静脉注射利多卡因-芬太尼与硬膜外注射罗哌卡因-芬太尼用于术后镇痛的前瞻性随机对照试验研究
Intravenous Lignocaine-Fentanyl Versus Epidural Ropivacaine-Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia After Major Abdominal Oncosurgery: A Pilot Prospective Randomised Study.
作者信息
Nandi Rudranil, Mishra Seema, Garg Rakesh, Kumar Vinod, Gupta Nishkarsh, Bharati Sachidanand Jee, Bhatnagar Sushma
机构信息
Department of Onco-anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
出版信息
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021 Apr;49(2):130-137. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2020.23326. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
OBJECTIVE
Epidural injection of local anaesthetics and intravenous opioid injection are two common analgesic strategies following major abdominal oncosurgery. However, epidural local anaesthetics may cause haemodynamic instability while opioid injection is associated with sedation and postoperative ileus. Intravenous lignocaine is also used for postoperative analgesia, and combined use of opioids plus lignocaine can reduce the doses and adverse effects of the individual drugs. This study therefore compared the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lignocaine-fentanyl (IV) to epidural ropivacaine-fentanyl (EPI) after major abdominal oncosurgery.
METHODS
Sixty patients were randomised to IV and EPI groups. Patients in the IV group received preoperative intravenous bolus injections of lignocaine 1.5 mg kg and fentanyl 0.5 μg kg, intraoperative infusions of lignocaine 1 mg kg h and fentanyl 0.5 μg kg h, and postoperative infusions of lignocaine 0.5 mg kg h and fentanyl 0.25 μg kg h. In the EPI group, patients received a 6-ml epidural bolus injection of ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 μg mL, intraoperative infusion of 5 mL·h fentanyl and postoperative ropivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 1 μg mL infusion at 5 mL h. All patients also received postoperative patient-controlled IV fentanyl as rescue analgesia. Patient-controlled fentanyl consumption was documented as the primary outcome for postoperative analgesic efficacy. Results were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test and Student's t-test using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software.
RESULTS
Median (min-max) rescue fentanyl requirement in the first 24 h postsurgery was comparable between IV and EPI groups [780 (340-2520) μg vs. 820 (140-2260) μg; p=0.6], as was postoperative pain score (p>0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension requiring bolus mephenteramine injection was significantly higher in the EPI group than the IV group (36% vs. 17%; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Intravenous lignocaine-fentanyl and epidural ropivacaine-fentanyl have comparable postoperative analgesic efficacies after major open abdominal oncosurgery.
目的
硬膜外注射局部麻醉药和静脉注射阿片类药物是腹部大型肿瘤手术后两种常见的镇痛策略。然而,硬膜外局部麻醉药可能导致血流动力学不稳定,而阿片类药物注射与镇静和术后肠梗阻有关。静脉注射利多卡因也用于术后镇痛,阿片类药物与利多卡因联合使用可减少各药物的剂量和不良反应。因此,本研究比较了腹部大型肿瘤手术后静脉注射利多卡因-芬太尼(IV)与硬膜外注射罗哌卡因-芬太尼(EPI)的镇痛效果。
方法
60例患者随机分为IV组和EPI组。IV组患者术前静脉推注利多卡因1.5mg/kg和芬太尼0.5μg/kg,术中输注利多卡因1mg·kg/h和芬太尼0.5μg·kg/h,术后输注利多卡因0.5mg·kg/h和芬太尼0.25μg·kg/h。EPI组患者接受硬膜外推注0.2%罗哌卡因6ml加芬太尼2μg/ml,术中输注芬太尼5ml/h,术后输注0.1%罗哌卡因加芬太尼1μg/ml,速度为5ml/h。所有患者术后均接受患者自控静脉注射芬太尼作为补救镇痛。记录患者自控芬太尼消耗量作为术后镇痛效果的主要指标。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件通过曼-惠特尼U检验和学生t检验比较结果。
结果
术后24小时内,IV组和EPI组的中位(最小值-最大值)补救芬太尼需求量相当[780(340-2520)μg对820(140-2260)μg;p=0.6],术后疼痛评分也相当(p>0.05)。EPI组术中需要推注去氧肾上腺素注射的低血压发生率显著高于IV组(36%对17%;p<0.001)。
结论
腹部大型开放性肿瘤手术后,静脉注射利多卡因-芬太尼和硬膜外注射罗哌卡因-芬太尼的术后镇痛效果相当。