Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2021 Aug;106(8):1720-1730. doi: 10.1113/EP089581. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
What is the central question of this study? There is a paradoxical reduction in augmentation index during lower-body dynamic (LBD) exercise in the face of an increase in central pressure. To determine causality, the amplitudes of forward and backward pressure waves were assessed separately using wave separation analysis. What is the main finding and its importance? Reflection magnitude decreased during LBD exercise in healthy young adults and was attributable to an increased forward pressure wave amplitude and decreased backward pressure wave amplitude. This vasoactive response might limit the adverse effects of wave reflection during LBD exercise, optimizing ventricular-arterial interactions.
Acute lower-body dynamic (LBD) exercise decreases surrogate measures of wave reflection, such as the augmentation index. However, the augmentation index is influenced by the combined effects of wave reflection timing, magnitude and other confounding factors external to wave reflection, which make it difficult to discern the origin of changes in surrogate measures. The relative contributions of forward (Pf) and backward (Pb) pressure wave amplitudes to central pressure can be determined by wave separation analysis. Reflection magnitude (RM = Pb/Pf) and the timing of apparent wave reflection return can also be determined. We tested the hypothesis that acute LBD exercise decreases RM and reflected wave transit time (RWTT). Applanation tonometry was used to record radial artery pressure waveforms in 25 adults (24 ± 4 years of age) at baseline and during light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise. Wave separation analysis was conducted offline using a personalized physiological flow wave to determine Pf, Pb, RM and RWTT. The RM decreased during all intensities of exercise compared with baseline (all P < 0.001; baseline, 43 ± 5%; light, 33 ± 6%; moderate, 23 ± 7%; vigorous, 17 ± 5%). The reduction in RM was attributable to the combined effect of increased Pf and decreased Pb during exercise. The RWTT decreased during all intensities of exercise compared with baseline (all P < 0.04; baseline, 156 ± 17 ms; light, 144 ± 15 ms; moderate, 129 ± 16 ms; vigorous, 121 ± 17 ms). Lastly, in a stepwise multilinear regression, Pf, but not Pb and RWTT, contributed to increased central pulse pressure during LBD exercise. These data show that wave reflection decreased and that central pulse pressure is most influenced by Pf during LBD exercise.
本研究的核心问题是什么?在下肢动态(LBD)运动中,中心压力增加的同时,增强指数呈矛盾性降低。为了确定因果关系,使用波分离分析分别评估前向和后向压力波的幅度。主要发现及其重要性是什么?在健康的年轻成年人中,LBD 运动期间反射幅度降低,这归因于前向压力波幅度增加和后向压力波幅度降低。这种血管活性反应可能会限制 LBD 运动期间的波反射的不利影响,从而优化心室-动脉相互作用。
急性下肢动态(LBD)运动可降低增强指数等压力波反射的替代指标。然而,增强指数受到波反射定时、幅度和反射以外的其他混杂因素的综合影响,这使得难以辨别替代指标变化的起源。波分离分析可确定中心压力的前向(Pf)和后向(Pb)压力波幅度的相对贡献。反射幅度(RM=Pb/Pf)和明显波反射返回的定时也可以确定。我们检验了这样一个假设,即急性 LBD 运动降低 RM 和反射波传播时间(RWTT)。应用平板张力法在基线和轻、中、高强度运动期间记录 25 名成年人(24±4 岁)的桡动脉压力波形。离线使用个性化生理流量波进行波分离分析,以确定 Pf、Pb、RM 和 RWTT。与基线相比,所有强度的运动期间 RM 均降低(均 P<0.001;基线为 43±5%;轻为 33±6%;中为 23±7%;强为 17±5%)。RM 的降低归因于运动期间 Pf 增加和 Pb 减少的综合作用。与基线相比,所有强度的运动期间 RWTT 均降低(均 P<0.04;基线为 156±17ms;轻为 144±15ms;中为 129±16ms;强为 121±17ms)。最后,在逐步多元线性回归中,Pf 而不是 Pb 和 RWTT 对 LBD 运动期间的中心脉搏压力增加有贡献。这些数据表明,LBD 运动期间反射降低,而中心脉搏压力主要受 Pf 影响。