Stock Joseph M, Chouramanis Nicholas V, Chirinos Julio A, Edwards David G
Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Oct 1;129(4):709-717. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00281.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
Early return and increased magnitude of wave reflection augments pulsatile load, wastes left ventricular effort, and is associated with cardiovascular events. Acute handgrip (HG) exercise increases surrogate measures of wave reflection such as augmentation index. However, augmentation index does not allow distinguishing between timing versus magnitude of wave reflection and is affected by factors other than wave reflection per se. Wave separation analysis decomposes central pressure into relative contributions of forward (Pf) and backward (Pb) pressure wave amplitudes to calculate reflection magnitude (RM = Pb/Pf) and determine the timing of apparent wave reflection return. We tested the hypothesis that acute dynamic and isometric HG exercise increases RM and decreases reflected wave transit time (RWTT). Applanation tonometry was used to record radial artery pressure waveforms in 30 adults (25 ± 4 yr) at baseline and during dynamic and isometric HG exercise. Wave separation analysis was performed offline using a physiological flow wave to derive Pf, Pb, RM, and RWTT. We found that RM increased during dynamic and isometric HG exercise compared with baseline ( = 0.04 and < 0.01, respectively; baseline 40 ± 5, dynamic 43 ± 6, isometric 43 ± 7%). Meanwhile, RWTT decreased during dynamic and isometric HG exercise compared with baseline ( = 0.03 and < 0.001, respectively; baseline 164 ± 23, dynamic 155 ± 23, isometric 148 ± 20 ms). Moreover, the changes in RM and RWTT were not different between dynamic and isometric HG exercise. The present data suggest that wave reflection timing (RWTT) and magnitude (RM) are important factors that contribute to increased central blood pressure during HG exercise. This study demonstrated that wave reflection magnitude is increased while reflected wave transit time is decreased during handgrip exercise in healthy young adults. The larger backward pressure waves and earlier return of these pressure waves were not different between dynamic and isometric handgrip exercise. These acute changes in wave reflection during handgrip exercise transiently augment pulsatile load.
波反射的早期返回和幅度增加会增大搏动负荷,浪费左心室的做功,并与心血管事件相关。急性握力(HG)运动可增加波反射的替代指标,如增强指数。然而,增强指数无法区分波反射的时间与幅度,且会受到波反射本身以外的因素影响。波分离分析将中心压力分解为正向(Pf)和反向(Pb)压力波振幅的相对贡献,以计算反射幅度(RM = Pb/Pf)并确定明显波反射返回的时间。我们检验了以下假设:急性动态和等长握力运动可增加RM并缩短反射波传播时间(RWTT)。采用压平式眼压计在30名成年人(25±4岁)的基线状态以及动态和等长握力运动期间记录桡动脉压力波形。使用生理血流波离线进行波分离分析,以得出Pf、Pb、RM和RWTT。我们发现,与基线相比,动态和等长握力运动期间RM均增加(分别为P = 0.04和P < 0.01;基线时为40±5,动态时为43±6,等长时为43±7%)。同时,与基线相比,动态和等长握力运动期间RWTT均缩短(分别为P = 0.03和P < 0.001;基线时为164±23,动态时为155±23,等长时为148±20毫秒)。此外,动态和等长握力运动期间RM和RWTT的变化并无差异。目前的数据表明,波反射时间(RWTT)和幅度(RM)是导致握力运动期间中心血压升高的重要因素。本研究表明,在健康年轻成年人的握力运动期间,波反射幅度增加而反射波传播时间缩短。动态和等长握力运动之间,较大的反向压力波及其更早返回并无差异。握力运动期间波反射的这些急性变化会短暂增大搏动负荷。