Department of Education, University of Oxford, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Nov;39(4):566-583. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12380. Epub 2021 May 18.
The multidimensional structure of spatial ability remains a debated issue. However, the developmental trajectories of spatial skills have yet to be investigated as a source of evidence within this debate. We tested the intrinsic versus extrinsic and static versus dynamic dimensions of the Uttal et al. (2013, Psychol. Bull., 139, 352) typology in relation to spatial development. Participants (N = 184) aged 6-11 completed spatial tasks chosen to measure these spatial dimensions. The results indicated that the developmental trajectories of intrinsic versus extrinsic skills differed significantly. Intrinsic skills improved more between 6 and 8 years, and 7 and 8 years, than extrinsic skills. Extrinsic skills increased more between 8 and 10 years than intrinsic skills. The trajectories of static versus dynamic skills did not differ significantly. The findings support the intrinsic versus extrinsic, but not the static versus dynamic dimension, of the Uttal et al. (2013, Psychol. Bull., 139, 352) typology.
空间能力的多维结构仍然是一个有争议的问题。然而,作为这一争论中的一个证据来源,空间技能的发展轨迹尚未得到研究。我们测试了 Uttal 等人(2013,《心理通报》,139,352)类型学的内在与外在以及静态与动态维度与空间发展的关系。参与者(N=184)年龄在 6-11 岁之间,完成了选择来衡量这些空间维度的空间任务。结果表明,内在与外在技能的发展轨迹有显著差异。内在技能在 6 到 8 岁和 7 到 8 岁之间的提高幅度大于外在技能。外在技能在 8 到 10 岁之间的增长幅度大于内在技能。静态与动态技能的轨迹没有显著差异。研究结果支持 Uttal 等人(2013,《心理通报》,139,352)类型学的内在与外在维度,但不支持静态与动态维度。