Suppr超能文献

硬腭和颊侧微型种植体失败的生存估计和风险因素。

Survival estimates and risk factors for failure of palatal and buccal mini-implants.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):756-763. doi: 10.2319/090720-777.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the success and survival rates of palatal and buccal mini-implants for different locations and treatment requirements. The secondary objective was to evaluate risk factors influencing the survival of mini-implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort, records of 127 orthodontic patients with 257 mini-implants were included after imposing inclusion/exclusion criteria. Along with the implant failure data, factors such as age, sex, transverse location, anteroposterior location, and purpose of mini-implants were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to draw the curves and a Nathan Mantel-David Cox test to compare variables.

RESULTS

The failure rate of palatal mini-implants was 8.5%, whereas the failure rate for buccal shelf mini-implants was 68.7% (P < .0001). A significant difference was that the survival rates of palatal mini-implants were dependent on the purpose of the mini-implants and, for the buccal mini-implants, they were dependent on the skeletal malocclusion and location type of mini-implants (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival rate of palatal mini-implants was high, at 91.5%. Of the buccal mini-implants, inter-radicular mini-implants had the highest survival rate for 12 (75.5%) and 24 (71.9%) months, while buccal shelf mini-implants had the lowest success and survival rates for 12 (31.3%) and 24 (20.8%) months. Class III malocclusion had the lowest survival rate for the buccal mini-implants (65.3% and 54.2%) for 12 and 24 months.

摘要

目的

主要目的是比较腭部和颊部微型种植体在不同位置和治疗需求下的成功率和存活率。次要目的是评估影响微型种植体存活率的风险因素。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,根据纳入/排除标准,共纳入了 127 名正畸患者的 257 个微型种植体的记录。除了种植体失败数据外,还记录了患者的年龄、性别、横向位置、前后位置以及微型种植体的用途等因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析绘制曲线,采用 Nathan Mantel-David Cox 检验比较变量。

结果

腭部微型种植体的失败率为 8.5%,而颊部支架微型种植体的失败率为 68.7%(P<.0001)。显著差异在于,腭部微型种植体的存活率取决于微型种植体的用途,而对于颊部微型种植体,存活率取决于骨骼错颌畸形和微型种植体的位置类型(P<.05)。

结论

腭部微型种植体的总体存活率较高,为 91.5%。在颊部微型种植体中,根间微型种植体在 12 个月(75.5%)和 24 个月(71.9%)时的存活率最高,而颊部支架微型种植体在 12 个月(31.3%)和 24 个月(20.8%)时的成功率和存活率最低。对于颊部微型种植体,III 类错颌畸形的存活率最低,12 个月和 24 个月时分别为 65.3%和 54.2%。

相似文献

1
Survival estimates and risk factors for failure of palatal and buccal mini-implants.
Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):756-763. doi: 10.2319/090720-777.1.
3
Evaluation of the success and complication rates of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 May;21(5):546-552. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_105_17.
5
Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015.
6
A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):768-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01405.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.032.
8
Intrusion method for a single overerupted maxillary molar using only palatal mini-implants and partial fixed appliances.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Mar;149(3):411-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.016.
9
Five years of experience using palatal mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;65(12):2492-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.651.
10
The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug;35(8):704-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.018. Epub 2006 May 9.

引用本文的文献

3
8
The Orthodontic Mini-Implants Failures Based on Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review.
Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):417-429. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772249. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and growth variation in palatal bone thickness and density for mini-implant placement.
Prog Orthod. 2018 Nov 5;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0241-1.
2
Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Sep 28;40(5):519-530. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx093.
4
A prospective study of factors associated with orthodontic mini-implant survival.
J Oral Sci. 2016;58(4):515-521. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.16-0145.
5
Temporary skeletal anchorage devices: the case for miniscrews.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.009.
6
Evaluation of mechanical properties of three different screws for rapid maxillary expansion.
Biomed Eng Online. 2013 Dec 11;12:128. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-128.
7
Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Nov;142(5):577-595.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.016.
8
Bone anchor systems for orthodontic application: a systematic review.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Nov;41(11):1427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Stability changes of miniscrew implants over time.
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):994-1000. doi: 10.2319/120810-711.1. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):388-95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq090. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验