• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Treating Pain With Open-Label Placebos: A Qualitative Study With Post-Surgical Pain Patients.用开放式安慰剂治疗疼痛:一项针对术后疼痛患者的定性研究。
J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1518-1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
How orthopedic surgeons view open label placebo pills: Ethical and effective, but opposed to personal use.骨科医生如何看待开放性标签安慰剂丸:伦理上有效,但反对个人使用。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Dec;151:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110638. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
3
Primary care providers' use of and attitudes towards placebos: An exploratory focus group study with US physicians.初级保健提供者对安慰剂的使用和态度:一项美国医生的探索性焦点小组研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):596-614. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12429. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Would You Take an Open-Label Placebo Pill or Give One to Your Child? Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey.你会服用一颗无盲法的安慰剂药丸,还是会给你的孩子服用呢?一项横断面调查的结果。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Feb 2;17:393-400. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S439783. eCollection 2024.
5
Experiences of Patients Taking Conditioned Open-Label Placebos for Reduction of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Exposure After Spine Surgery.脊柱手术后,患者使用条件性开放标签安慰剂减轻术后疼痛和阿片类药物暴露的体验。
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Aug;30(4):509-521. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10114-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Open-label placebo clinical trials: is it the rationale, the interaction or the pill?开放性安慰剂临床试验:是原理、相互作用还是安慰剂丸?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):159-165. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111209. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Reducing Emotional Distress with Open-Label Placebos: Assessing the Role of Motor Engagement in Pill Consumption.使用开放标签安慰剂减轻情绪困扰:评估运动参与在吞服药物过程中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 29;14(6):455. doi: 10.3390/bs14060455.
8
Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Acute Postoperative Pain (OLP-POP Study): Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.开放性安慰剂治疗急性术后疼痛(OLP-POP研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 5;8:687398. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.687398. eCollection 2021.
9
Preoperative Anxiolysis and Treatment Expectation (PATE Trial): open-label placebo treatment to reduce preoperative anxiety in female patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery - study protocol for a bicentric, prospective, randomized-controlled trial.术前抗焦虑与治疗期望(PATE试验):开放标签安慰剂治疗以减轻接受妇科腹腔镜手术的女性患者的术前焦虑——一项双中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 9;15:1396562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1396562. eCollection 2024.
10
Open-Label Placebo Injection for Chronic Back Pain With Functional Neuroimaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性安慰剂注射治疗慢性背痛与功能神经影像学:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32427.

引用本文的文献

1
Talking placebo: a qualitative study of patients' attitudes toward open-label placebo implementation into clinical practice.谈论安慰剂:一项关于患者对在临床实践中实施开放标签安慰剂态度的定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1533663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533663. eCollection 2025.
2
Open label placebo to treat fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis: feasibility and preliminary effects.开放标签安慰剂治疗多发性硬化症患者疲劳:可行性及初步效果
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01674-w.
3
A systematic qualitative review of ethical issues in open label placebo in published research.已发表研究中开放标签安慰剂伦理问题的系统定性综述。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 10;15(1):12268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96425-5.
4
A qualitative study of imaginary pills and open-label placebos in test anxiety.关于考试焦虑中想象药物和开放性安慰剂的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0291004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291004. eCollection 2023.
5
Can the Open Label Placebo Rationale Be Optimized?开放标签安慰剂原理能否得到优化?
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 30;2:734882. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.734882. eCollection 2021.
6
How orthopedic surgeons view open label placebo pills: Ethical and effective, but opposed to personal use.骨科医生如何看待开放性标签安慰剂丸:伦理上有效,但反对个人使用。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Dec;151:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110638. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus.临床医生应告知患者关于安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的哪些信息?基于专家共识的实际考量。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(1):49-56. doi: 10.1159/000510738. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research.不仅仅是关于伦理开放性安慰剂研究的同意。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105893.
3
Conditioning open-label placebo: a pilot pharmacobehavioral approach for opioid dose reduction and pain control.条件性开放标签安慰剂:一种用于减少阿片类药物剂量和控制疼痛的先导性药物行为方法。
Pain Rep. 2020 Jul 20;5(4):e828. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000828. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
4
Placebos in chronic pain: evidence, theory, ethics, and use in clinical practice.慢性疼痛中的安慰剂:证据、理论、伦理及临床实践中的应用。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 20;370:m1668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1668.
5
Primary care providers' use of and attitudes towards placebos: An exploratory focus group study with US physicians.初级保健提供者对安慰剂的使用和态度:一项美国医生的探索性焦点小组研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):596-614. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12429. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Placebos in primary care? a nominal group study explicating UK GP and patient views of six theoretically plausible models of placebo practice.初级保健中的安慰剂?一项名义群体研究阐释了英国全科医生和患者对六种理论上合理的安慰剂实践模式的看法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e032524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032524.
7
Deceptive and Nondeceptive Placebos to Reduce Pain: An Experimental Study in Healthy Individuals.欺骗性和非欺骗性安慰剂减轻疼痛:健康个体的实验研究。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Feb;36(2):68-79. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000781.
8
Pain Response to Open Label Placebo in Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Adult Males.健康成年男性诱导性急性疼痛中对开放性安慰剂的疼痛反应。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Mar;132(3):571-580. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003076.
9
The role of placebos in family medicine: Implications of evidence and ethics for general practitioners.安慰剂在家庭医学中的作用:证据和伦理对全科医生的影响。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;48(10):700-705. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-05-19-4939.
10
Are Conditioned Open Placebos Feasible as an Adjunctive Treatment to Opioids? Results from a Single-Group Dose-Extender Pilot Study with Acute Pain Patients.条件性开放安慰剂作为阿片类药物的辅助治疗是否可行?一项针对急性疼痛患者的单组剂量扩展试点研究的结果。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(6):380-382. doi: 10.1159/000503038. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

用开放式安慰剂治疗疼痛:一项针对术后疼痛患者的定性研究。

Treating Pain With Open-Label Placebos: A Qualitative Study With Post-Surgical Pain Patients.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1518-1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.05.001
PMID:34004348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578133/
Abstract

Prior research has shown that Open Label Placebos (OLPs; that is, placebos described honestly as inactive pills) are effective for a variety of clinical conditions, including pain. However, little is known about patient attitudes towards OLPs. We conducted qualitative interviews with n = 11 patients (73% female) who recently had hand or wrist surgery and took ≥ 1 opioid pill. Interview topics included: pain management, the placebo effect, and in particular, attitudes towards OLPs. Interviews were analyzed inductively and content-coded. Five themes were identified: 1) Role of the mind in pain and illness, 2) Shortcomings of opioids are the strengths of OLPs, 3) Perceptions of OLP effectiveness, 4) Relational aspects of OLP administration, and 5) Practical considerations for OLP implementation. Most patients agreed that, because of their transparency, OLPs are ethical. Participants indicated some degree of reluctance about using OLPs, but the majority said they would take OLPs if prescribed by a doctor. Patients noted that the primary disadvantage of opioids is their potency, which can lead to addiction or side-effects; by contrast, the primary advantage of placebos is their inertness. Results suggest that OLPs appear to be well received as a postoperative pain treatment among the patients in this study. PERSPECTIVE: This qualitative study examines how hand surgery patients view OLPs, which are placebos described honestly as inactive pills. OLPs were generally well received by patients as a treatment for pain after surgery and could be considered as an adjunctive treatment to potentially reduce reliance on prescription opioids.

摘要

先前的研究表明,开放标签安慰剂(OLP;即被诚实地描述为无效药丸的安慰剂)对各种临床病症都具有疗效,包括疼痛。然而,人们对患者对 OLP 的态度知之甚少。我们对 n=11 名最近接受过手部或腕部手术且至少服用过 1 片阿片类药物的患者进行了定性访谈。访谈主题包括:疼痛管理、安慰剂效应,特别是对 OLP 的态度。访谈内容采用归纳法进行分析和内容编码。确定了五个主题:1)思想在疼痛和疾病中的作用,2)阿片类药物的缺点是 OLP 的优点,3)对 OLP 疗效的看法,4)OLP 给药的关系方面,5)OLP 实施的实际考虑因素。大多数患者认为,由于 OLP 的透明性,它们在道德上是可以接受的。参与者表示对使用 OLP 有一定程度的不情愿,但大多数人表示如果医生开处方,他们会服用 OLP。患者注意到阿片类药物的主要缺点是其效力,这可能导致成瘾或副作用;相比之下,安慰剂的主要优点是其惰性。研究结果表明,OLP 似乎作为一种术后疼痛治疗方法在本研究中的患者中受到欢迎。观点:这项定性研究检查了手部手术患者如何看待 OLP,OLP 是被诚实地描述为无效药丸的安慰剂。OLP 作为术后疼痛的治疗方法普遍受到患者的欢迎,可作为辅助治疗方法,以减少对处方阿片类药物的依赖。