Suppr超能文献

关于考试焦虑中想象药物和开放性安慰剂的定性研究。

A qualitative study of imaginary pills and open-label placebos in test anxiety.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0291004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291004. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of open-label placebos (OLPs) has been increasingly demonstrated and their use holds promise for applications compatible with basic ethical principles. Taking this concept one step further an imaginary pill (IP) intervention without the use of a physical pill was developed and tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). To explore participants' experiences and views, we conducted the first qualitative study in the field of IPs.

METHODS

A reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) of semi-structured interviews with test anxious students (N = 20) was nested in an RCT investigating an IP and OLP intervention. In addition, open-ended questions from the RCT were evaluated (N = 114) to corroborate the RTA and pill characteristics were included to more accurately capture the IP experience.

RESULTS

Four key themes were identified: (1) attitude towards the intervention, (2) applicability of the intervention, (3) experience of effects, and (4) characteristics of the imagination. The IP intervention was well-accepted, easily applicable, and various effects, pill characteristics and appearances were described. While many participants did not desire a physical pill, either due to the absence of the imagination component or aversion to pills, the approach was considered to be cognitively and time demanding, which in turn, however, encouraged the establishment of a therapeutic ritual that protected against the increase in test anxiety during the preparation phase. OLP findings were comparable, and especially the importance of a treatment rationale was stressed in both groups, counteracting an initial ambivalent attitude. The RTA findings were supported by the open-ended questions of the RCT.

CONCLUSION

IPs appear to be a well-accepted and easily applicable intervention producing a variety of beneficial effects. Thus, the IP approach might serve as an imaginary based alternative to OLPs warranting further investigations on its application to harness placebo effects without a physical pill.

摘要

背景

开放标签安慰剂(OLP)的疗效已得到越来越多的证明,其应用具有符合基本伦理原则的应用前景。更进一步,开发了一种无需使用物理药丸的想象药丸(IP)干预措施,并在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行了测试。为了探索参与者的经验和观点,我们在 IP 领域进行了首次定性研究。

方法

在一项对考试焦虑学生的 RCT 中,对 20 名测试焦虑学生的半结构化访谈进行了反思性主题分析(RTA)。此外,还对 RCT 中的开放式问题进行了评估(N = 114),以验证 RTA,并包括药丸特征,以更准确地捕捉 IP 体验。

结果

确定了四个关键主题:(1)对干预措施的态度,(2)干预措施的适用性,(3)效果体验,和(4)想象力的特征。IP 干预措施得到了很好的接受,易于应用,并且描述了各种效果,药丸特征和外观。虽然许多参与者由于缺乏想象力成分或对药丸的厌恶而不希望使用物理药丸,但这种方法被认为在认知和时间上都具有挑战性,反过来又鼓励建立一种治疗仪式,以防止在准备阶段考试焦虑的增加。OLP 的发现是可比的,并且在两组中都强调了治疗原理的重要性,从而抵消了最初的矛盾态度。RTA 的发现得到了 RCT 中开放式问题的支持。

结论

IP 似乎是一种易于接受且易于应用的干预措施,可产生多种有益效果。因此,IP 方法可能是一种基于想象的 OLP 替代方法,值得进一步研究,以利用安慰剂效应而无需使用物理药丸。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a18/10473493/bc121610ad0c/pone.0291004.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验