Suppr超能文献

比较前交叉韧带重建患者和健康受试者单腿垂直跳下落时的肌筋膜经络激活。

Comparing myofascial meridian activation during single leg vertical drop jump in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and healthy participants.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Sport Injury and Corrective Exercises, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2021 Jul;88:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Muscles work synergistically to support the body during landing. Myofascial meridians have been described to classify muscles into functional synergies. The role that these functional lines plays in positioning the trunk and lower extremity of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy athletes during drop landing tasks remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The purpose of this study was to compare the front and back functional lines (FFL and BFL) muscle activation in patients with ACLR and healthy participants during single leg vertical drop jump (SLVDJ).

METHODS

Thirty-two male athletes (post-ACLR = 16, healthy = 16) participated (age = 23.3 ± 2.3 years). Superficial electromyography of FFL (adductor longus [AL], rectus abdominis [RA], pectoralis major) and BFL (vastus lateralis [VL], gluteus maximus [GMax], latissimus dorsi [LD]) was collected during the SLVDJ and compared at initial contact and maximum knee flexion between groups using t-tests and limbs using paired-samples t-tests.

RESULTS

In the FFL, the AL (p < 0.05) and RA (p < 0.05) muscles were more active in the healthy group compared to the ACLR group at initial contact and maximum knee flexion. PM demonstrated greater activation in the healthy group only at maximum knee flexion (p < 0.05). In the BFL, the VL (p < 0.05) and GMax (p < 0.05) muscles were more active in the ACLR group, whereas the LD (p < 0.05) muscles demonstrated greater activation in the healthy group at initial contact and maximum knee flexion. There were no healthy group inter-limb differences in FFL and BFL activation. ACLR participants demonstrated greater non-injured limb VL, AL, GMax and LD activation (p < 0.05) and greater injured limb PM and RA activation (p < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Based on the present data, patients after ACLR may present with an alteration in BFL and FFL muscles activation during a drop jump task. Functional line muscles during dynamic activities may change lower extremity positioning and lead to increase ACL injury risk.

摘要

背景

肌肉协同工作以在着陆时支撑身体。肌筋膜经络已被描述为将肌肉分类为功能协同作用。这些功能线在定位前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者和健康运动员的躯干和下肢方面的作用在下落着陆任务中仍然不清楚。

研究问题

本研究的目的是比较 ACLR 患者和健康参与者在单腿垂直下落跳跃(SLVDJ)期间前和后功能线(FFL 和 BFL)肌肉的激活。

方法

32 名男性运动员(ACLR 后= 16 名,健康= 16 名)参加(年龄= 23.3 ± 2.3 岁)。在 SLVDJ 期间收集 FFL(内收肌长肌[AL],腹直肌[RA],胸大肌)和 BFL(股外侧肌[VL],臀大肌[GMax],背阔肌[LD])的表面肌电图,并使用 t 检验比较组间在初始接触和最大膝关节屈曲时的差异,使用配对样本 t 检验比较组间在初始接触和最大膝关节屈曲时的差异。

结果

在 FFL 中,与 ACLR 组相比,健康组在初始接触和最大膝关节屈曲时 AL(p < 0.05)和 RA(p < 0.05)肌肉的活性更高。PM 仅在最大膝关节屈曲时在健康组中表现出更高的激活(p < 0.05)。在 BFL 中,VL(p < 0.05)和 GMax(p < 0.05)肌肉在 ACLR 组中更活跃,而 LD(p < 0.05)肌肉在健康组中在初始接触和最大膝关节屈曲时表现出更高的激活。在 FFL 和 BFL 激活方面,健康组之间没有肢体差异。ACLR 参与者表现出更大的非受伤肢体 VL、AL、GMax 和 LD 激活(p < 0.05),以及更大的受伤肢体 PM 和 RA 激活(p < 0.05)。

意义

根据目前的数据,ACL 重建后患者在进行下落跳跃任务时可能会出现 BFL 和 FFL 肌肉激活的改变。动态活动中的功能线肌肉可能会改变下肢的定位,并导致 ACL 受伤风险增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验