• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者开放式手术床边气管切开术的成本分析。

Cost Analysis of Open Surgical Bedside Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.

Finance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Aug;102(8):516-521. doi: 10.1177/01455613211018578. Epub 2021 May 19.

DOI:10.1177/01455613211018578
PMID:34006128
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Open surgical tracheostomy (OST) is a common procedure performed on intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The procedure can be performed bedside in the ICU (bedside open surgical tracheostomy, BeOST) or in the operating room (operating room open surgical tracheostomy, OROST), with comparable safety and long-term complication rates. We aimed to perform a cost analysis and evaluate the use of human resources and the total time used for both BeOSTs and OROSTs.

METHODS

All OSTs performed in 2017 at 5 different ICUs at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål were retrospectively evaluated. The salaries of the personnel involved in the 2 procedures were obtained from the hospital's finance department. The time taken and the number of procedures performed were extracted from annual reports and from the electronic patient record system, and the annual expenditures were calculated.

RESULTS

Altogether, 142 OSTs were performed, of which 122 (86%) and 20 (14%) were BeOSTs and OROSTs, respectively. A BeOST cost 343 EUR (95% CI: 241.4-444.6) less than an OROST. Bedside open surgical tracheostomies resulted in an annual cost efficiency of 41.818 EUR. In addition, BeOSTs freed 279 hours of operating room occupancy during the study year. Choosing BeOST instead of OROST made 1 nurse, 2 surgical nurses, and 1 anesthetic nurse redundant.

CONCLUSION

Bedside open surgical tracheostomy appears to be cost-, time-, and resource-effective than OROST. In the absence of contraindications, BeOSTs should be performed in ICU patients whenever possible.

摘要

目的

开放式外科气管切开术(OST)是在重症监护病房(ICU)中对患者进行的常见手术。该手术可以在 ICU 床边进行(床边开放式外科气管切开术,BeOST)或在手术室进行(手术室开放式外科气管切开术,OROST),其安全性和长期并发症发生率相当。我们旨在进行成本分析,并评估两种方法(BeOST 和 OROST)在使用人力资源和总时间方面的情况。

方法

回顾性评估了 2017 年在奥斯陆大学医院 Ullevål 的 5 个不同 ICU 进行的所有 OST。涉及两种手术的人员工资从医院财务部获得。从年度报告和电子患者记录系统中提取所用时间和手术次数,并计算年度支出。

结果

总共进行了 142 例 OST,其中 122 例(86%)为 BeOST,20 例(14%)为 OROST。BeOST 比 OROST 便宜 343 欧元(95%CI:241.4-444.6)。床边开放式外科气管切开术每年的成本效益为 41818 欧元。此外,BeOST 在研究年内释放了 279 个手术室占用时间。选择 BeOST 而不是 OROST,使 1 名护士、2 名外科护士和 1 名麻醉护士冗余。

结论

床边开放式外科气管切开术在成本、时间和资源方面似乎优于 OROST。在没有禁忌症的情况下,应尽可能在 ICU 患者中进行 BeOST。

相似文献

1
Cost Analysis of Open Surgical Bedside Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit Patients.重症监护病房患者开放式手术床边气管切开术的成本分析。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Aug;102(8):516-521. doi: 10.1177/01455613211018578. Epub 2021 May 19.
2
Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.开放性与经皮扩张气管切开术:疗效与成本分析
Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2.
3
Comparative analysis of bedside and operating room tracheostomies in critically ill patients with burns.烧伤重症患者床旁气管切开术与手术室气管切开术的对比分析
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 May-Jun;16(3 Pt 1):258-61. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00007.
4
Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.重症监护病房中的床边气管切开术:一项比较开放手术气管切开术与内镜引导下经皮扩张气管切开术的前瞻性随机试验。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Mar;111(3):494-500. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200103000-00021.
5
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
6
Safety and efficiency of elective tracheostomy performed in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房进行择期气管切开术的安全性和有效性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Aug;53(8):895-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90276-7.
7
An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.开放手术与经皮气管切开术的时间及人员利用情况分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109-14. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
8
Safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy program.多学科经皮气管切开术项目的安全性、效率和成本效益。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1827-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e16af.
9
Comparison of open versus bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the cardiothoracic surgical patient: outcomes and financial analysis.心胸外科手术患者开放性与床旁经皮扩张气管切开术的比较:结果与财务分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jun;79(6):1879-85. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.042.
10
Cricoid palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy.环状软骨可触及性作为床旁气管切开术的选择标准。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Creation of an Open Bedside Tracheostomy Program at a Community Hospital With a Single Surgeon.在一家由单一外科医生主刀的社区医院开展开放式床边气管造口术项目。
OTO Open. 2023 Feb 17;7(1):e27. doi: 10.1002/oto2.27. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.