Department of Ophthalmology, Hangil Eye Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;106(11):1524-1529. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318559. Epub 2021 May 18.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) is important for identifying glaucomatous damage. Ultrawide-field fundus photography (UWP) imaging is increasingly used in the ophthalmological field; however, it is unknown whether it can be used for detecting RNFL defects (RNFLDs). We investigated whether RNFLD can be detected with UWP images and compared the clinical effectiveness of three types of images for detecting RNFLD: conventional red-free RNFL photography (RFP), non-mydriatic UWP and digitally converted green separation of non-mydriatic UWP (G-UWP).
Eyes with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect and normal control eyes meeting the eligibility criteria were consecutively enrolled from September 2019 to April 2020. Their conventional RFP, non-mydriatic UWP and G-UWP images were assessed for detecting RNFLD to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RNFLD.
Three image sets of 196 participants (84 normal control, 25 glaucoma suspect and 87 glaucoma) were obtained. The sensitivity of G-UWP (94.6%; 95% CI 88.7 to 98.0) and RFP (92.9%; 95% CI 86.4 to 96.9) was higher than that of UWP (82.1%; 95% CI 73.8 to 88.7; p<0.05). The sensitivities of G-UWP and RFP are comparable. The specificity of G-UWP (78.6%; 95% CI 68.3 to 86.8) and UWP (75.0%; 95% CI 64.4 to 83.8) was comparable, but both were lower than that of RFP (98.8%; 95% CI 93.5 to 100.0; p<0.05).
Non-mydriatic UWP images can be used to detect RNFLD. Non-mydriatic G-UWP showed comparable sensitivity but lower specificity to conventional RFP. Non-mydriatic G-UWP could be used as a convenient and useful diagnostic tool for screening glaucoma in clinical settings.
背景/目的:评估视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)对于识别青光眼损伤很重要。超广角眼底摄影(UWP)成像在眼科领域的应用越来越广泛;然而,尚不清楚它是否可用于检测 RNFL 缺陷(RNFLD)。我们研究了 UWP 图像是否可以检测到 RNFLD,并比较了三种检测 RNFLD 的图像类型的临床效果:传统的无赤光 RNFL 摄影(RFP)、非散瞳超广角和数字化转换的非散瞳超广角的绿色分离(G-UWP)。
从 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 4 月,连续招募符合入选标准的青光眼或青光眼疑似患者以及正常对照组的眼睛。评估他们的传统 RFP、非散瞳 UWP 和 G-UWP 图像以检测 RNFLD,以评估检测 RNFLD 的敏感性和特异性。
共获得三组共 196 名参与者的图像(84 名正常对照组、25 名青光眼疑似患者和 87 名青光眼患者)。G-UWP(94.6%;95%CI 88.7 至 98.0)和 RFP(92.9%;95%CI 86.4 至 96.9)的敏感性高于 UWP(82.1%;95%CI 73.8 至 88.7;p<0.05)。G-UWP 和 RFP 的敏感性相当。G-UWP(78.6%;95%CI 68.3 至 86.8)和 UWP(75.0%;95%CI 64.4 至 83.8)的特异性相当,但均低于 RFP(98.8%;95%CI 93.5 至 100.0;p<0.05)。
非散瞳 UWP 图像可用于检测 RNFLD。非散瞳 G-UWP 与传统 RFP 的敏感性相当,但特异性较低。非散瞳 G-UWP 可作为临床筛查青光眼的一种方便有用的诊断工具。