• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫肿瘤学药物:政策影响与经济考量

Immuno-Oncology Medicines: Policy Implications and Economic Considerations.

作者信息

Adunlin Georges, Ferreri Stefanie P, Dong Jenny, Freeman Maisha Kelly

机构信息

Samford University.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 8;10(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i3.1799. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.24926/iip.v10i3.1799
PMID:34007565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8127089/
Abstract

Significant progress has taken place in the field of cancer immunotherapy in recent years. Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown rather dramatic results and are believed to have completely transformed the field of oncology. However, these transformational therapies are more expensive than previous cancer therapies. As more cancer immunotherapy agents are being developed, with some already being marketed, it is important to consider how economic constraints will shape health policy and value assessment related to these agents. A number of strategies have been suggested to alleviate the price burden and the ensuing concerns about the sustainability of publicly funded healthcare systems. Among these strategies, value-based pricing (VBP) for innovative drugs dominates the headlines in the field of oncology. The specifics of how VBP may be implemented in the United States is still unclear. Nonetheless, policy reform and economic considerations will have to be incorporated into the planning of VBP. The objective of this paper is multifold: (i) to identify the factors affecting the impact of cancer immunotherapy on healthcare cost; (ii) to critically appraise current approaches used to assess the value of novel cancer therapies; (iii) to assess the methodological challenges associated with the economic evaluation of cancer immunotherapy. As the health care system in the U.S transitions toward a value-based model, the need for a formal value assessment framework is warranted in cancer immunotherapy.

摘要

近年来,癌症免疫治疗领域取得了重大进展。癌症免疫治疗,尤其是免疫检查点抑制剂,已显示出相当显著的效果,并被认为彻底改变了肿瘤学领域。然而,这些变革性疗法比以往的癌症治疗方法更昂贵。随着越来越多的癌症免疫治疗药物被研发出来,其中一些已经上市,考虑经济限制将如何影响与这些药物相关的卫生政策和价值评估就显得尤为重要。人们已经提出了一些策略来减轻价格负担以及随之而来的对公共资助医疗系统可持续性的担忧。在这些策略中,创新药物的基于价值的定价(VBP)在肿瘤学领域成为头条新闻。VBP在美国具体如何实施仍不明确。尽管如此,政策改革和经济考量必须纳入VBP的规划中。本文的目的是多方面的:(i)确定影响癌症免疫治疗对医疗成本影响的因素;(ii)批判性地评估目前用于评估新型癌症治疗价值的方法;(iii)评估与癌症免疫治疗经济评估相关的方法学挑战。随着美国医疗系统向基于价值的模式转变,癌症免疫治疗需要一个正式的价值评估框架。

相似文献

1
Immuno-Oncology Medicines: Policy Implications and Economic Considerations.免疫肿瘤学药物:政策影响与经济考量
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 8;10(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i3.1799. eCollection 2019.
2
Operationalizing value-based pricing of medicines : a taxonomy of approaches.使药品的基于价值的定价具有操作性:方法分类。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0001-x.
3
Implementation of Value-based Pricing for Medicines.药品基于价值的定价实施。
Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
4
Health-related quality-of-life assessment of patients with solid tumors on immuno-oncology therapies.免疫肿瘤治疗的实体瘤患者的健康相关生活质量评估。
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1360-1368. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33457. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications.欧洲癌症药物定价的潜在方法,以提高医疗保健系统的可持续性及其影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):527-540. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Health Centers and Value-Based Payment: A Framework for Health Center Payment Reform and Early Experiences in Medicaid Value-Based Payment in Seven States.健康中心与基于价值的支付:健康中心支付改革框架及七个州医疗补助基于价值支付的早期经验
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):879-917. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12580.
7
Clinical Pharmacology Considerations for the Development of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.免疫检查点抑制剂研发的临床药理学考量
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;57 Suppl 10:S26-S42. doi: 10.1002/jcph.990.
8
States Encouraging Value-Based Payment: Lessons From CMS's State Innovation Models Initiative.鼓励基于价值的支付的州:CMS 的州创新模式倡议的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):506-542. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12380. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
9
Value-Based Pricing and Budget Impact Analysis for Multi-Indication Drugs: A Case Study of Immunotherapies.基于价值的定价和多适应症药物的预算影响分析:免疫疗法案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074105.
10
From a Patient Advocate's Perspective: Does Cancer Immunotherapy Represent a Paradigm Shift?从患者权益倡导者的角度来看:癌症免疫疗法是否代表了一种范式转变?
Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Feb 7;20(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0662-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Toripalimab regimen for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in China and America.托瑞帕利单抗方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌在中国和美国的成本效益分析。
Front Immunol. 2025 May 16;16:1556100. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1556100. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Tumor Treating Fields treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Tumor Treating Fields 治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌中国患者的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 22;12:1276049. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1276049. eCollection 2024.
3
Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.中国广泛期小细胞肺癌阿得贝利单抗联合化疗的更新成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e077090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077090.
4
Economic evaluation of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.在中国,司妥昔单抗联合化疗作为一线治疗食管鳞癌的经济学评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 7;13(12):e078924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078924.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer from the perspective of the healthcare system in China.基于中国医疗体系的视角,评估塞普鲁单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 16;13(8):e072106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072106.
6
Economic evaluation of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的经济学评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;11:1137255. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137255. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Value-Based Pricing for Drugs: Theme and Variations.基于价值的药品定价:主题与变奏
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2165-2166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4871.
2
Cost effectiveness vs. affordability in the age of immuno-oncology cancer drugs.免疫肿瘤学癌症药物时代的成本效益与可负担性
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Aug;18(4):351-357. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1467270. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
A U.S. "Cancer Moonshot" to accelerate cancer research.美国发起“抗癌登月计划”以加速癌症研究。
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1105-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aai7862. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Pharmacoeconomics of Biosimilars: What Is There to Gain from Them?生物类似药的药物经济学:它们能带来什么好处?
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016 Aug;18(8):50. doi: 10.1007/s11926-016-0601-0.
5
Toward Value-Based Pricing to Boost Cancer Research and Innovation.推动基于价值的定价,以促进癌症研究和创新。
Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 1;76(11):3127-9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3179. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Financial Hardship Associated With Cancer in the United States: Findings From a Population-Based Sample of Adult Cancer Survivors.美国癌症相关的经济困难:基于成年癌症幸存者人群样本的研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):259-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.0468. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
Payer and Policy Maker Steps to Support Value-Based Pricing for Drugs.支付方和政策制定者支持基于价值的药品定价的步骤。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2503-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16843.
8
Milestone Survival: A Potential Intermediate Endpoint for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.里程碑生存:免疫检查点抑制剂的潜在中间终点
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 25;107(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv156. Print 2015 Sep.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.美国临床肿瘤学会声明:评估癌症治疗方案价值的概念框架。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 10;33(23):2563-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6706. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Evolution of health technology assessment: best practices of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.卫生技术评估的演变:泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查的最佳实践
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jun 3;7:287-98. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S82549. eCollection 2015.