University of Texas at Austin.
University of Nebraska-Kearney.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Jun;92(2):209-221. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1884178.
: Physical education policies provide guidance and accountability to develop quality programs that increase physical literacy. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of physical education policy research to explore its effects on the school environment and programming as an essential component of physical education. : Using the PRISMA guidelines of identify, screen, determine eligibility, and include, studies were extracted from four different databases, using search terms related to the essential physical education component of policy and environment. Of the 225 publications identified, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria for this investigation. Each paper was coded, and emergent themes were identified. : The policy research was predominantly descriptive and focused on: (a) minutes in physical education (83%), (b) moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; 31%), (c) certified/qualified teachers (24%), (d) exemptions (17%), and (e) student-teacher ratio (12%). Emergent themes of adherence, policy strength, and implementation accountability were identified as influential physical education policy aspects. : Policy research over the last 20 years was focused on the regulatory mandate of time. Policy research did not directly address disciplinary process variables of learning activities or outcomes of physical education. The effects of policy exemptions and class size were underrepresented. Themes may explain the lack of reporting student performance as the primary outcome. Further research is needed to examine the downstream effects of physical education policy and determine whether well-written policies increase the number of physically literate individuals.
: 体育政策为制定提高身体素养的优质课程提供了指导和问责制。本研究的目的是对体育政策研究进行系统回顾,以探讨其对学校环境和课程的影响,因为这些是体育教育的重要组成部分。 : 本研究使用 PRISMA 指南的识别、筛选、确定资格和纳入标准,从四个不同的数据库中提取研究,使用与政策和环境的基本体育教育组成部分相关的搜索词。在确定的 225 篇出版物中,有 42 篇研究符合本研究的纳入标准。对每篇论文进行编码,并确定出现的主题。 : 政策研究主要是描述性的,侧重于:(a) 体育教育的时间(83%),(b) 中等到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA;31%),(c) 认证/合格的教师(24%),(d) 豁免(17%),以及 (e) 师生比(12%)。坚持、政策力度和实施问责制等新出现的主题被确定为有影响力的体育教育政策方面。 : 在过去 20 年的政策研究中,重点是时间的监管要求。政策研究并没有直接解决体育教育学习活动或成果的学科过程变量。政策豁免和班级规模的影响被低估了。这些主题可能解释了为什么没有报告学生表现作为主要结果。需要进一步研究来检验体育教育政策的下游影响,并确定编写良好的政策是否会增加身体素养个体的数量。