Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Aug 1;6(8):880-888. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0487.
Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with poor health outcomes. However, whether socioeconomic factors are associated with post-myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes in younger patient populations is unknown.
To evaluate the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage with long-term outcomes among patients who experienced an MI at a young age.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed patients in the Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI Registry (at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts) who experienced an MI at or before 50 years of age between January 1, 2000, and April 30, 2016. Each patient's home address was mapped to the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) to capture higher rates of socioeconomic disadvantage. The median follow-up duration was 11.3 years. The dates of analysis were May 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020.
Patients were assigned an ADI ranking according to their home address and then stratified into 3 groups (least disadvantaged group, middle group, and most disadvantaged group).
The outcomes of interest were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Cause of death was adjudicated from national registries and electronic medical records. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to evaluate the association of ADI with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
The cohort consisted of 2097 patients, of whom 2002 (95.5%) with an ADI ranking were included (median [interquartile range] age, 45 [42-48] years; 1607 male individuals [80.3%]). Patients in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be Black or Hispanic, have public insurance or no insurance, and have higher rates of traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Among the 1964 patients who survived to hospital discharge, 74 (13.6%) in the most disadvantaged group compared with 88 (12.6%) in the middle group and 41 (5.7%) in the least disadvantaged group died. Even after adjusting for a comprehensive set of clinical covariates, higher neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a 32% higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.60; P = .004) and a 57% higher cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.17-2.10; P = .003).
This study found that, among patients who experienced an MI at or before age 50 years, socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even after adjusting for clinical comorbidities. These findings suggest that neighborhood and socioeconomic factors have an important role in long-term post-MI survival.
社会经济劣势与较差的健康结果相关。然而,在年轻患者人群中,社会经济因素是否与心肌梗死后(MI)结局相关尚不清楚。
评估在年轻时经历 MI 的患者中,社区层面社会经济劣势与长期结局的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究分析了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 4 月 30 日期间在波士顿马萨诸塞州总医院布列根妇女医院和波士顿麻省总医院经历 MI 的年龄在 50 岁或以下的年轻 MI 登记处(YOUNG-MI 登记处)患者。每位患者的家庭住址都被映射到区域剥夺指数(ADI)上,以捕捉更高的社会经济劣势率。中位随访时间为 11.3 年。分析日期为 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日。
根据家庭住址为患者分配 ADI 排名,然后将其分为 3 组(最不劣势组、中间组和最劣势组)。
感兴趣的结局是全因和心血管死亡率。死因由国家登记处和电子病历确定。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估 ADI 与全因和心血管死亡率的关系。
该队列包括 2097 名患者,其中包括 2002 名(95.5%)有 ADI 排名的患者(中位[四分位间距]年龄,45[42-48]岁;1607 名男性[80.3%])。居住在劣势社区的患者更可能是黑人和/或西班牙裔,拥有公共保险或没有保险,且更有可能存在高血压和糖尿病等传统心血管危险因素。在 1964 名存活至出院的患者中,与中间组的 88 名(12.6%)和最不劣势组的 41 名(5.7%)相比,最劣势组中有 74 名(13.6%)死亡。即使在调整了一系列综合临床协变量后,较高的邻里劣势与全因死亡率增加 32%相关(风险比,1.32;95%CI,1.10-1.60;P = .004),心血管死亡率增加 57%相关(风险比,1.57;95%CI,1.17-2.10;P = .003)。
这项研究发现,在经历 MI 年龄在 50 岁或以下的患者中,社会经济劣势与全因和心血管死亡率升高有关,即使在调整了临床合并症后也是如此。这些发现表明,邻里和社会经济因素在 MI 后长期生存中起着重要作用。