Sullivan Karen A
School of Psychology and Counselling, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia .
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Nov 1;31(6):509-515. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000843.
The correct identification of concussion symptoms is vital for mild traumatic brain injury recognition, diagnosis, and injury management. Numerous surveys of symptom recognition have been conducted, including with athletes at-risk for injury. This critical, methodologically focused review aimed to: (1) discover which concussion symptoms are recognized, and (2) provide recommendations for future research.
A quasi-systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that used the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey.
Eighty-five publications were identified, 8 of which were retained after screening.
The identification of individual concussion symptoms was coded as good (a correct response by >90% of the sample), moderate (a correct response by 75%-90% of the sample), or poor (a correct response by <75% of the sample).
The pooled data comprised responses from more than 2000 individuals, most of whom were male, young adult, sport players. Overall, there was good recognition of 3 concussion symptoms (headaches, dizziness, and confusion), poor recognition of sleep disturbances, nausea, and loss of consciousness, and misattribution to concussion of 2 distractor symptoms (weakness of neck range of motion, difficulty speaking). The methodological evaluation revealed significant variability in symptom measurement.
The identified trends for concussion symptom recognition must be regarded as tentative because of the significant methodological variation in the reviewed studies. This variability affected the number, wording, and classification of items, and it restricted the data synthesis. This problem must be addressed in future research and recommendations are provided.
正确识别脑震荡症状对于轻度创伤性脑损伤的识别、诊断及损伤管理至关重要。已开展了多项症状识别调查,包括针对有受伤风险的运动员。这项以方法学为重点的关键综述旨在:(1)找出哪些脑震荡症状得到了识别,以及(2)为未来研究提供建议。
进行了一项准系统文献检索,以识别使用罗森鲍姆脑震荡知识与态度调查的研究。
共识别出85篇出版物,筛选后保留了其中8篇。
将个体脑震荡症状的识别编码为良好(样本中>90%的正确回答)、中等(样本中75%-90%的正确回答)或较差(样本中<75%的正确回答)。
汇总数据包括来自2000多名个体的回答,其中大多数为男性、年轻成年人、运动员。总体而言,对3种脑震荡症状(头痛、头晕和意识模糊)识别良好,对睡眠障碍、恶心和意识丧失识别较差,并且将2种干扰症状(颈部活动范围减弱、言语困难)错误归因于脑震荡。方法学评估显示症状测量存在显著差异。
由于所综述研究在方法学上存在显著差异,所确定的脑震荡症状识别趋势必须视为初步的。这种差异影响了条目的数量、措辞和分类,并限制了数据综合。这个问题必须在未来研究中加以解决,并提供了相关建议。