• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲非正式照护者福祉的社会经济不平等。

Socioeconomic inequalities in the wellbeing of informal caregivers across Europe.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2022 Aug;26(8):1589-1596. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1926425. Epub 2021 May 19.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2021.1926425
PMID:34010061
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Due to increasing care needs and decreasing care potentials, research around informal caregiving gains attention. Relatively new - but of utmost importance - is the role of socioeconomic inequalities in care and wellbeing. Although caregiving can be rewarding, a growing body of research shows that informal caregiving often has negative consequences for individuals' wellbeing. Theoretically, we expect these negative outcomes to be more pronounced among caregivers with lower socioeconomic resources. The current study examines socioeconomic inequalities in the consequences of caregiving inside the household for life satisfaction.

METHODS

We draw on longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE waves 2, 4, 5, and 6). We estimated pooled ordinary least squares and fixed-effects regression models to examine the consequences of informal care provision within the household for individuals' life satisfaction, and whether household wealth moderates this relationship, controlling for individuals' sociodemographic and health characteristics.

RESULTS

Care provision inside the household was negatively associated with older adults' life satisfaction. The longitudinal analyses accordingly show that the uptake of care led to declines in life satisfaction. Differentiating by socioeconomic background, we find that caregivers with higher socioeconomic resources in terms of wealth generally experienced higher life satisfaction. Our longitudinal analyses on wellbeing declines reveal, however, that these mechanisms did not significantly differ by socioeconomic status of the caregiver.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest the need for increased investments in support services for informal caregivers to mitigate caregiving burdens, irrespective of socioeconomic status, and enhance later life wellbeing.

摘要

目的

由于护理需求不断增加,而护理能力却在下降,因此人们对非正式护理的关注度日益提高。相对较新的,但极其重要的是,社会经济不平等在护理和幸福感方面的作用。尽管护理可能是有回报的,但越来越多的研究表明,非正式护理往往会对个人的幸福感产生负面影响。从理论上讲,我们预计社会经济资源较低的护理人员会受到这些负面影响的更大影响。本研究考察了家庭内部护理对生活满意度的后果方面存在的社会经济不平等。

方法

我们借鉴了欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE 波 2、4、5 和 6)的纵向数据。我们使用汇总普通最小二乘法和固定效应回归模型来检验家庭内部非正式护理提供对个人生活满意度的影响,以及家庭财富是否调节了这种关系,同时控制了个人的社会人口学和健康特征。

结果

家庭内部的护理提供与老年人的生活满意度呈负相关。因此,纵向分析表明,接受护理会导致生活满意度下降。根据社会经济背景进行区分,我们发现,在财富方面具有较高社会经济资源的护理人员通常会有更高的生活满意度。然而,我们关于幸福感下降的纵向分析表明,这些机制在护理人员的社会经济地位方面没有显著差异。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,需要增加对非正式护理人员的支持服务投资,以减轻护理负担,不论其社会经济地位如何,并提高晚年的幸福感。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in the wellbeing of informal caregivers across Europe.欧洲非正式照护者福祉的社会经济不平等。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Aug;26(8):1589-1596. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1926425. Epub 2021 May 19.
2
Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.欧洲非正式照料中的社会经济差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Dec 14;19(3):621-632. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00666-y. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: A longitudinal approach.欧洲非正式照料的健康影响:一种纵向研究方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;173:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
4
Wishing for an end? Longitudinal analysis of suicidal ideation among informal caregivers inside and outside their household in different welfare systems of Europe.是否希望结束?不同福利制度下的欧洲家庭内外非正式照护者的自杀意念纵向分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2023 Dec;35(12):736-750. doi: 10.1017/S1041610223000601. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Changes in Network Size, Quality, and Composition among Informal Caregivers in Different Welfare Clusters: Longitudinal Analyses Based on a Pan-European Survey (SHARE).不同福利集群中非正式照顾者的网络规模、质量和构成的变化:基于泛欧调查(SHARE)的纵向分析。
Gerontology. 2023;69(12):1461-1470. doi: 10.1159/000534187. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
6
Do Informal Caregivers Expect to Die Earlier? A Longitudinal Study with a Population-Based Sample on Subjective Life Expectancy of Informal Caregivers.非正规照护者是否预期寿命更短?一项基于人群样本的关于非正规照护者主观预期寿命的纵向研究。
Gerontology. 2021;67(4):467-481. doi: 10.1159/000513933. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study.家庭及机构化长期护理中非正式照护的积极与消极结果:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3.
8
Cohort Trajectories by Age and Gender for Informal Caregiving in Europe Adjusted for Sociodemographic Changes, 2004 and 2015.欧洲按年龄和性别划分的非正式照护轨迹调整了社会人口变化后,2004 年和 2015 年的情况。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Aug 2;78(8):1412-1422. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad011.
9
[Distance caregiving : Empirical findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe].[远程照护:来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查的实证研究结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Oct;52(6):529-536. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01605-4. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
[Importance of health indicators in the analysis of health effects on informal caregivers : Different indicator, different result?].[健康指标在分析非正规照料者健康影响中的重要性:不同指标,不同结果?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Feb;53(1):10-16. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01663-8. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A care regime typology of elder, long-term care institutions.老年长期护理机构的照护模式类型学
Eur J Ageing. 2025 May 7;22(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00854-0.
2
Assessing the quality of life of schizophrenia patients and their family caregivers in a Romanian sample: the role of clinical, sociocultural, and demographic factors.评估罗马尼亚样本中精神分裂症患者及其家庭照顾者的生活质量:临床、社会文化和人口因素的作用。
Med Pharm Rep. 2025 Jan;98(1):96-110. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2816. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
The Impact of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Organisational Justice on Global Health and Turnover Intentions in Animal Care Workers.
工作要求、工作资源和组织公正对动物护理工作者全球健康和离职意向的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 3;15(3):420. doi: 10.3390/ani15030420.
4
Competing demands on adult children: How do they shape their provision of informal care?成年子女面临的相互冲突的需求:这些需求如何影响他们提供的非正式照料?
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jan 10;29:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101754. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Perspectives of Caring for Older Persons: A Scoping Review.关怀老年人的视角:范围综述。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241296618. doi: 10.1177/21501319241296618.
6
Cross-country variations in the caregiver role: evidence from the ENTWINE-iCohort study.跨国间照护者角色的差异:来自 ENTWINE-iCohort 研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18302-6.
7
Examining the Impact of Long-Term Care Insurance on the Care Burden and Labor Market Participation of Informal Carers: A Quasi-Experimental Study in China.考察长期护理保险对非正规护理者的护理负担和劳动力市场参与的影响:中国的准实验研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 May 1;79(5). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae023.
8
Long-term care needs and the risk of household poverty across Europe: a comparative secondary data study.欧洲的长期护理需求与家庭贫困风险:一项比较性二次数据研究
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04687-x.
9
The Effect of Long-Term (Im)balance of Giving Versus Receiving Support With Nonrelatives on Subjective Well-Being Among Home-Dwelling Older People.给予与接受非亲属支持的长期(非)平衡对居家老年人主观幸福感的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Apr 1;79(4). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad198.
10
Wealth inequalities in physical and cognitive impairments across Japan and Europe: the role of health expenditure and infrastructure.日欧在身体和认知障碍方面的贫富差距:医疗支出和基础设施的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jun 29;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01906-6.