• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的前瞻性随机单盲对照试验

Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Children with Overactive Bladder: Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2021;105(11-12):1011-1017. doi: 10.1159/000515992. Epub 2021 May 19.

DOI:10.1159/000515992
PMID:34010843
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of newly diagnosed overactive bladder (OAB) in children.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study on pediatric patients with newly diagnosed OAB. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: mirabegron (50 mg once daily) in group I, solifenacin (5 mg) in group II, and placebo in group III. Before starting our treatment and at the end of the 3 months course, we obtained a 3-day voiding diary. This diary included incontinence episode per day, mean voided volume per micturition, mean number of micturition per day, and post-void residual urine. Moreover, the parents/patients were asked to rate symptom relief, and the adverse events were recorded throughout the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients aged from 5 to 14 years completed this study. At the end of this trial, both groups I and II showed significant improvement versus placebo regarding our efficacy parameters with no significant difference between group I and II. The overall success rate based on assessment of symptom relief was significantly higher in the treated groups (87.5% in I and 90.2% in II) versus placebo (55.8%). Dry mouth was reported in 2.8, 10, and 0% and constipation in 2.8, 11.4, and 1.4% in group I, II, and III, respectively, without statistically significant difference between group I and placebo. However, there was a significant difference between group II and placebo regarding these side effects.

CONCLUSION

Both mirabegron and solifenacin have comparable efficacy regarding the control of OAB symptoms in the newly diagnosed children, but mirabegrone seems to have less side effects.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗新诊断的儿童膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们对新诊断为 OAB 的儿科患者进行了前瞻性随机对照研究。患者随机分为 3 组:米拉贝隆(50mg 每日 1 次)组 I、索利那新(5mg)组 II 和安慰剂组 III。在开始治疗前和 3 个月疗程结束时,我们获得了 3 天的排尿日记。该日记包括每天失禁发作次数、每次排尿量、每天排尿次数和残余尿量。此外,父母/患者被要求评估症状缓解情况,并在整个研究期间记录不良反应。

结果

共有 190 名年龄在 5 至 14 岁的患者完成了本研究。在试验结束时,与安慰剂组相比,I 组和 II 组在我们的疗效参数方面均显示出显著改善,且 I 组和 II 组之间无显著差异。基于症状缓解评估的总体成功率在治疗组(I 组为 87.5%,II 组为 90.2%)显著高于安慰剂组(55.8%)。口干在 I 组、II 组和安慰剂组中的发生率分别为 2.8%、10%和 0%,便秘在 I 组、II 组和安慰剂组中的发生率分别为 2.8%、11.4%和 1.4%,I 组与安慰剂组之间无统计学差异。然而,在这些副作用方面,II 组与安慰剂组之间存在显著差异。

结论

米拉贝隆和索利那新在控制新诊断儿童的 OAB 症状方面具有相当的疗效,但米拉贝隆的副作用似乎较少。

相似文献

1
Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Children with Overactive Bladder: Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的前瞻性随机单盲对照试验
Urol Int. 2021;105(11-12):1011-1017. doi: 10.1159/000515992. Epub 2021 May 19.
2
Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: efficacy and safety results from a randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 study (Symphony).米拉贝隆与索利那新联合治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、剂量范围、2 期研究(Symphony)的结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):577-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
3
Efficacy and Tolerability of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Monotherapy or Combination Therapies for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.米拉贝隆对比抗胆碱能单药治疗或联合治疗用于治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效和耐受性:一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):324-333. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
Results of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled, multicenter study of mirabegron, a β3-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients with overactive bladder in Asia.β3肾上腺素能受体激动剂米拉贝隆在亚洲膀胱过度活动症患者中进行的一项随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂和活性药物对照的多中心研究结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Sep;34(7):685-92. doi: 10.1002/nau.22645. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Mirabegron: Analysis of a Large Integrated Clinical Trial Database of Patients with Overactive Bladder Receiving Mirabegron, Antimuscarinics, or Placebo.米拉贝隆的安全性和疗效:接受米拉贝隆、抗毒蕈碱药物或安慰剂的膀胱过度活动症患者大型综合临床试验数据库分析。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
Long-term safety and efficacy of mirabegron and solifenacin in combination compared with monotherapy in patients with overactive bladder: SYNERGY II study.米拉贝隆与索利那新联合用药与单药治疗对膀胱过度活动症患者的长期安全性及疗效:SYNERGY II研究
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan-Feb;43(1):51-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Safety and efficacy of mirabegron as 'add-on' therapy in patients with overactive bladder treated with solifenacin: a post-marketing, open-label study in Japan (MILAI study).米拉贝隆作为索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的“附加”疗法的安全性和有效性:日本的一项上市后开放标签研究(MILAI研究)。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):612-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13068. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Mirabegron in overactive bladder: a review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability.米拉贝隆治疗膀胱过度活动症:疗效、安全性和耐受性评价。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jan;33(1):17-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.22505. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy and Urodynamic Findings of Solifenacin Succinate versus Mirabegron in Women with Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.琥珀酸索利那新与米拉贝隆治疗女性膀胱过度活动症的疗效及尿动力学结果比较:一项随机对照研究的结果
Urol Int. 2016;97(3):325-329. doi: 10.1159/000445808. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
Efficacy and safety of combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in patients with overactive bladder (SYNERGY study).米拉贝隆与索利那新联合用药对比单药治疗及安慰剂治疗对膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和安全性(协同研究)
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):562-575. doi: 10.1111/bju.13882. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategy for Withdrawal of Pharmacological Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Children (StayDry): Protocol for an Open-Label Prospective Randomized Trial.儿童尿失禁药物治疗撤药策略(保持干爽):一项开放标签前瞻性随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 9;14:e63226. doi: 10.2196/63226.
2
Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron, and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry): Protocol for a Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Trial.索利那新、米拉贝隆及联合疗法治疗儿童日间尿失禁的疗效(BeDry):一项随机单盲对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e63588. doi: 10.2196/63588.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Treatment of Non-neurogenic Overactive Bladder in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗儿童非神经源性膀胱过度活动症的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验
Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Mar-Apr;51(2). doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0425.
4
Safety and effectiveness of mirabegron for children and adolescents with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder for improving urinary symptoms: a systematic review.米拉贝隆用于治疗难治性特发性膀胱过度活动症儿童及青少年以改善泌尿症状的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):206-212. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.237. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
5
Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效及药物不良反应
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):147-151. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_166_23. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome.米拉贝隆用于膀胱过度活动症的治疗
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Sep 16;14:1337-1350. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S372597. eCollection 2022.
7
The Effectiveness in Activating M-Type K Current Produced by Solifenacin ([(3R)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-3-yl] (1S)-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-isoquinoline-2-carboxylate): Independent of Its Antimuscarinic Action.索利那新([(3R)-1-氮杂双环[2.2.2]辛烷-3-基](1S)-1-苯基-3,4-二氢-1H-异喹啉-2-甲酰胺)激活 M 型钾电流的有效性:与其抗毒蕈碱作用无关。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 17;22(22):12399. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212399.