Kuhfeld Megan, Domina Thurston, Hanselman Paul
NWEA.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
AERA Open. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):1-18. doi: 10.1177/2332858419858324. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
The Stanford Educational Data Archive (SEDA) is the first data set to allow comparisons of district academic achievement and growth from Grades 3 to 8 across the United States, shining a light on the distribution of educational opportunities. This study describes a convergent validity analysis of the SEDA growth estimates in mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) by comparing the SEDA estimates against estimates derived from NWEA's MAP Growth assessments. We find strong precision-adjusted correlations between growth estimates from SEDA and MAP Growth in math (.90) and ELA (.82). We also find that the discrepancy between the growth estimates in ELA is slightly more pronounced in high socioeconomic districts. Our analyses indicate a high degree of congruence between the SEDA estimates and estimates derived from the vertically scaled MAP Growth assessment. However, small systematic discrepancies imply that the SEDA growth estimates are less likely to generalize to estimates obtained through MAP Growth in some states.
斯坦福教育数据存档(SEDA)是首个能够对美国各地从三年级到八年级的学区学业成绩和进步情况进行比较的数据集,为教育机会的分布提供了线索。本研究通过将SEDA的估计值与从NWEA的MAP Growth评估得出的估计值进行比较,描述了SEDA在数学和英语语言艺术(ELA)方面增长估计的收敛效度分析。我们发现,SEDA和MAP Growth在数学(.90)和ELA(.82)方面的增长估计之间存在很强的精度调整相关性。我们还发现,在高社会经济地位的学区,ELA增长估计之间的差异更为明显。我们的分析表明,SEDA估计值与从纵向缩放的MAP Growth评估得出的估计值高度一致。然而,小的系统差异意味着SEDA增长估计不太可能推广到某些州通过MAP Growth获得的估计值。