• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读和数学技能的不平等主要在幼儿园之前形成:对《学校是伟大的平等器吗?》的复制及部分修正

Inequality in Reading and Math Skills Forms Mainly before Kindergarten: A Replication, and Partial Correction, of "Are Schools the Great Equalizer?".

作者信息

von Hippel Paul T, Workman Joseph, Downey Douglas B

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Sociol Educ. 2018 Oct;91(4):323-357. doi: 10.1177/0038040718801760. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1177/0038040718801760
PMID:38818352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139062/
Abstract

When do children become unequal in reading and math skills? Some research claims that inequality grows mainly before school begins. Some research claims that schools cause inequality to grow. And some research-including the 2004 study "Are Schools the Great Equalizer?"-claims that inequality grows mainly during summer vacations. Unfortunately, the test scores used in the Great Equalizer study suffered from a measurement artifact that exaggerated estimates of inequality growth. In addition, the Great Equalizer study is dated and its participants are no longer school-aged. In this article, we replicate the Great Equalizer study using better test scores in both the original data and a newer cohort of children. When we use the new test scores, we find that variance is substantial at the start of kindergarten and does not grow but actually shrinks over the next two to three years. This finding, which was not evident in the original Great Equalizer study, implicates the years before kindergarten as the primary source of inequality in elementary reading and math. Total score variance grows during most summers and shrinks during most school years, suggesting that schools reduce inequality overall. Changes in inequality are small after kindergarten and do not replicate consistently across grades, subjects, or cohorts. That said, socioeconomic gaps tend to shrink during the school year and grow during the summer, while the black-white gap tends to follow the opposite pattern.

摘要

儿童在阅读和数学技能方面何时开始出现差异?一些研究称,差异主要在入学前就开始扩大。一些研究称,学校导致差异扩大。还有一些研究——包括2004年的研究《学校是伟大的平等izer吗?》——称,差异主要在暑假期间扩大。不幸的是,“伟大的平等izer”研究中使用的测试成绩存在测量误差,夸大了对差异增长的估计。此外,“伟大的平等izer”研究年代久远,其参与者已不再处于学龄期。在本文中,我们在原始数据和一组更新的儿童中使用更好的测试成绩来重复“伟大的平等izer”研究。当我们使用新的测试成绩时,我们发现幼儿园入学时差异就很大,在接下来的两到三年里并没有扩大,实际上还缩小了。这一在原始的“伟大的平等izer”研究中并不明显的发现,表明幼儿园之前的几年是小学阅读和数学差异的主要来源。总分差异在大多数暑假期间扩大,在大多数学年期间缩小,这表明学校总体上减少了差异。幼儿园之后差异的变化很小,并且在不同年级、科目或群体中并不能一致地重复出现。也就是说,社会经济差距在学年期间往往会缩小,在暑假期间会扩大,而黑白差距则往往呈现相反的模式。

相似文献

1
Inequality in Reading and Math Skills Forms Mainly before Kindergarten: A Replication, and Partial Correction, of "Are Schools the Great Equalizer?".阅读和数学技能的不平等主要在幼儿园之前形成:对《学校是伟大的平等器吗?》的复制及部分修正
Sociol Educ. 2018 Oct;91(4):323-357. doi: 10.1177/0038040718801760. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Socioeconomic, Ethnic, Racial, and Gender Gaps in Children's Social/Behavioral Skills: Do They Grow Faster in School or out?儿童社会/行为技能方面的社会经济、种族、民族和性别差距:它们在学校还是校外增长得更快?
Sociol Sci. 2019;6:446-466. doi: 10.15195/v6.a17. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
School accountability and the black-white test score gap.学校问责制与黑白学生考试成绩差距
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Mar;44:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
4
School readiness and later achievement: replication and extension using a nationwide Canadian survey.学校准备度与后期成就:全国性加拿大调查的复制与拓展。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):995-1007. doi: 10.1037/a0018880.
5
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
6
When does 1 + 1 not equal 2? The relative advantage of public school-based pre-k versus head start for low-income children's kindergarten cognitive and self-regulatory skills.1加1在什么时候不等于2?公立学校学前教育项目相对于“启智计划”对低收入儿童幼儿园认知和自我调节技能的相对优势。
Dev Psychol. 2022 May;58(5):848-865. doi: 10.1037/dev0001335.
7
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.针对K-6年级有学习困难或有学习困难风险的学生提高阅读和数学能力的校本干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;17(2):e1152. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1152. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Longitudinal predictors of reading and math trajectories through middle school for African American versus Caucasian students across two samples.两个样本中,非裔美国学生与白种学生整个中学阶段阅读和数学成绩轨迹的纵向预测指标。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1018-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018877.
9
Gestational Age and Kindergarten School Readiness in a National Sample of Preterm Infants.全国早产儿样本中的胎龄与幼儿园入学准备情况
J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;178:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.062. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Cluster (school) RCT of ParentCorps: impact on kindergarten academic achievement.家长团群组随机对照试验:对幼儿园学业成绩的影响。
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1521-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2632. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The summer parental investment gap? Socioeconomic gaps in the seasonality of parental expenditures and time with school-age children.夏季父母投资差距?父母支出季节性及陪伴学龄儿童时间方面的社会经济差距。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2023 Oct;87. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100846. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Time in School: A Conceptual Framework, Synthesis of the Causal Research, and Empirical Exploration.在校时间:一个概念框架、因果研究综述及实证探索
Am Educ Res J. 2024 Aug;61(4):724-766. doi: 10.3102/00028312241251857. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on White Matter Plasticity in the Reading Network.新冠疫情学校关闭对阅读网络中白质可塑性的影响。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jan 10;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00158. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring the Associations of Afterschool Science Participation and Friendships with Science Identities.探索课外科学活动参与以及友谊与科学身份认同之间的关联。
Res Sci Educ. 2024;54(6):1155-1172. doi: 10.1007/s11165-024-10173-6. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers.幼儿园能力分组安置存在偏见吗?新数据、新方法、新答案。
Am Educ Res J. 2022 Aug;59(4):820-857. doi: 10.3102/00028312211061410. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
White matter microstructural plasticity associated with educational intervention in reading disability.与阅读障碍教育干预相关的白质微观结构可塑性
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00108. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
Does Achievement Rise Fastest with School Choice, School Resources, or Family Resources? Chile from 2002 to 2013.学业成绩的提升在学校选择、学校资源或家庭资源中哪方面最快?2002年至2013年的智利情况。
Sociol Educ. 2020 Apr;93(2):132-152. doi: 10.1177/0038040719899358. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Effects of summer schools: Who benefits the most?暑期学校的效果:谁受益最大?
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0302060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302060. eCollection 2024.
9
Children's Health, Wellbeing and Academic Outcomes over the Summer Holidays: A Scoping Review.暑假期间儿童的健康、幸福与学业成绩:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 27;11(3):287. doi: 10.3390/children11030287.
10
Socioeconomic, Ethnic, Racial, and Gender Gaps in Children's Social/Behavioral Skills: Do They Grow Faster in School or out?儿童社会/行为技能方面的社会经济、种族、民族和性别差距:它们在学校还是校外增长得更快?
Sociol Sci. 2019;6:446-466. doi: 10.15195/v6.a17. Epub 2019 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
State of the Art Review: Poverty and the Developing Brain.技术现状综述:贫困与发育中的大脑
Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3075. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
2
Schools, Skills, and Synapses.学校、技能与突触
Econ Inq. 2008 Jun;46(3):289. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00163.x.
3
Summer learning and its implications: insights from the Beginning School Study.暑期学习及其影响:来自入学初期研究的见解
New Dir Youth Dev. 2007 Summer(114):11-32. doi: 10.1002/yd.210.
4
Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies.教师期望与自我实现预言:已知与未知、已解决与未解决的争议。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(2):131-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3.
5
Computer adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试。
J Appl Meas. 2005;6(1):109-27.
6
The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech.环境影响的特异性:社会经济地位通过母亲的言语影响早期词汇发展。
Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1368-78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00612.