National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29 Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 Jun 2;13(21):24553-24564. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07530. Epub 2021 May 20.
Articular cartilage has very poor intrinsic healing ability and its repair remains a significant clinical challenge. To promote neocartilage regeneration, we fabricated two collagen (Col) scaffolds functionalized with a porcine decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) in the forms of particle and solution named pE-Col and sE-Col, respectively. Their differences were systematically compared, including the biochemical compositions, scaffold properties, cell-material interactions, and cartilage regeneration. While it is demonstrated that both forms of dECM could enhance the cell recruitment, proliferation, and chondrogenesis of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) , better performance was seen in the sE-Col group, which could quickly provide a more favorable chondrogenic microenvironment for endogenous BMSCs. The superiority of sE-Col was also proved by our study, which showed that the sE-Col scaffold achieved better structural hyaline-like neocartilage formation and subchondral bone repair compared to the pE-Col scaffold, according to the gross morphology, biological assessment, and micro-CT imaging analysis. Together, this study suggests that the sE-Col scaffold holds great potential in developing the one-step microfracture-based strategy for cartilage repair and also reminds us that despite dECM being a promising biomaterial in tissue engineering, the optimization of the proper processing methodology would be a crucial consideration in the future design of dECM-based scaffolds in articular cartilage regeneration.
关节软骨自我修复能力很差,其修复仍然是一个重大的临床挑战。为了促进新软骨再生,我们制备了两种胶原蛋白(Col)支架,分别以颗粒和溶液形式功能化猪去细胞细胞外基质(dECM),分别命名为 pE-Col 和 sE-Col。系统比较了它们的差异,包括生化组成、支架性能、细胞-材料相互作用和软骨再生。虽然已经证明两种形式的 dECM 都可以增强骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSCs)的细胞募集、增殖和软骨分化,但 sE-Col 组表现出更好的性能,因为它可以快速为内源性 BMSCs 提供更有利的软骨形成微环境。我们的研究也证明了 sE-Col 的优越性,研究表明,与 pE-Col 支架相比,sE-Col 支架在大体形态、生物学评估和 micro-CT 成像分析方面,更有利于结构透明样新生软骨的形成和软骨下骨的修复。总之,这项研究表明,sE-Col 支架在开发基于微骨折的一步法软骨修复策略方面具有很大的潜力,也提醒我们,尽管 dECM 是组织工程中很有前途的生物材料,但在未来设计基于 dECM 的关节软骨再生支架时,适当的处理方法的优化将是一个关键考虑因素。