• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受微创妇科良性疾病手术方面存在种族和民族差异。

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;33(4):279-287. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000719.

DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000719
PMID:34016820
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current US literature and describe the extent, source, and impact of disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in surgical route and outcomes for hysterectomy, myomectomy, and endometriosis surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the nationwide trend toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS), BIPOC women are disproportionally less likely to undergo MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy and have higher rates of perioperative complications. African American women, in particular, receive significantly disparate care. Contemporary literature on the prevalence of endometriosis in BIPOC women is lacking. Further, there is little data on the racial and ethnic differences in endometriosis surgery access and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology exist and these differences are not fully accounted for by patient, socioeconomic, or healthcare infrastructure factors. Initiatives that incentivize hiring surgeons trained to perform complex gynecologic surgery, standardized pathways for route of surgery, quality improvement focused on increased hospital MIS volume, and hospital-based public reporting of MIS volume data may be of benefit for minimizing disparities. Further, initiatives to reduce disparities need to address racism, implicit bias, and healthcare structural issues that perpetuate disparities.

摘要

综述目的: 回顾美国当前的文献,描述黑人和少数族裔(BIPOC)在接受子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术和子宫内膜异位症手术时手术途径和结局方面存在差异的程度、来源和影响。

最近发现:尽管全国范围内微创手术(MIS)的趋势不断发展,但 BIPOC 女性接受 MIS 子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术的可能性不成比例地较低,且围手术期并发症的发生率更高。非裔美国女性,尤其是,接受的护理存在明显差异。关于 BIPOC 女性中子宫内膜异位症的患病率的当代文献不足。此外,关于子宫内膜异位症手术途径和结局的种族和民族差异的数据很少。

总结:在获得用于良性病理的微创妇科手术方面,存在种族和民族差异,这些差异不能完全归因于患者、社会经济或医疗保健基础设施因素。鼓励招聘接受过复杂妇科手术培训的外科医生、标准化手术途径、以增加医院 MIS 量为重点的质量改进以及基于医院的 MIS 量数据的公开报告等举措可能有助于最大限度地减少差异。此外,减少差异的举措需要解决导致差异持续存在的种族主义、隐性偏见和医疗保健结构性问题。

相似文献

1
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology.在接受微创妇科良性疾病手术方面存在种族和民族差异。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;33(4):279-287. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000719.
2
Racial/Ethnic Disparities/Differences in Hysterectomy Route in Women Likely Eligible for Minimally Invasive Surgery.在有资格接受微创手术的女性中,子宫切除术入路的种族/民族差异/不同。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(5):1167-1177.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Myomas.种族和民族对子宫肌瘤微创手术使用的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Nov;29(11):1241-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
4
Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.获得微创子宫切除术的社会决定因素:重新评估种族与良性疾病子宫切除途径之间的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):572.e1-572.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Clinical Trial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.微创妇科手术临床试验中的种族和民族差异。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 May;31(5):414-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Disparate use of minimally invasive surgery in benign surgical conditions.在良性外科疾病中微创外科手术的使用差异。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1977-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0003-0. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
7
The impact of race on hysterectomy for benign indications.种族对良性指征行子宫切除术的影响。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;32(4):263-268. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000633.
8
Each Uterus Counts: A narrative review of health disparities in benign gynaecology and minimal access surgery.每个子宫都算数:良性妇科和微创外科健康差异的叙事性综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Evidence from 143 Illinois Hospitals, 2016 to 2018.患者和医院特征与微创子宫切除术相关:来自伊利诺伊州 2016 年至 2018 年 143 家医院的证据。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1337-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
10
Does Universal Insurance Mitigate Racial Differences in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy?全民保险能否减轻微创子宫切除术中的种族差异?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):790-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
FIGO-IPPS consensus statement: Addressing the global unmet needs of women with chronic pelvic pain.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)-国际盆腔疼痛协会(IPPS)共识声明:满足慢性盆腔疼痛女性的全球未满足需求。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1140-1145. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70093. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Rates of Minimally Invasive Surgery After Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Common General Surgery Operations.普通普外科手术引入机器人辅助手术后微创手术的发生率。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jan 31;6(1):e546. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000546. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.
衡量美国医院住院手术可及性不平等情况
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 6;2(11):qxae142. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae142. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Sociodemographic variation in the utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches for pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌微创外科治疗利用的社会人口学差异。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Oct;26(10):1280-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.403. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Surgical Care for Racial and Ethnic Minorities and Interventions to Address Inequities: A Narrative Review.少数民族的外科护理和解决不平等问题的干预措施:叙事性综述。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):184-192. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005858. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Insurance Disparities in Access to Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.保险对结直肠癌机器人手术可及性的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3560-3568. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13354-1. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
Dobbs and disability: Implications of abortion restrictions for people with chronic health conditions.多布斯案与残疾:堕胎限制对慢性病患者的影响
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):197-201. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14108. Epub 2022 Nov 30.