• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量美国医院住院手术可及性不平等情况

Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.

作者信息

Bergman Alon, David Guy, Nathan Ashwin, Giri Jay, Ryan Michael, Chikermane Soumya, Thompson Christin, Clancy Seth, Gunnarsson Candace

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Health Care Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 6;2(11):qxae142. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae142. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae142
PMID:39564567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574731/
Abstract

Geographic disparities in access to inpatient procedures are a significant issue within the US healthcare system. This study introduces the Procedure Access Inequality (PAI) index, a standardized metric to quantify these disparities while adjusting for disease prevalence. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, we analyzed inpatient procedure data from 18 states between 2016 and 2019. The PAI index reveals notable variability in access inequality across different procedures, with minimally invasive and newer procedures exhibiting higher inequality. Key findings indicate that procedures such as skin grafts and minimally invasive gastrectomy have the highest PAI scores, while cesarean sections and percutaneous coronary interventions have the lowest. The study highlights that higher inequality is associated with greater market concentration and in particular, fewer hospitals offering these procedures. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions to address procedural access disparities to promote more equitable healthcare delivery across the United States.

摘要

在美国医疗保健系统中,住院手术可及性方面的地域差异是一个重大问题。本研究引入了手术可及性不平等(PAI)指数,这是一种标准化指标,用于在调整疾病患病率的同时量化这些差异。利用医疗成本与利用项目州住院数据库的数据,我们分析了2016年至2019年期间18个州的住院手术数据。PAI指数显示,不同手术的可及性不平等存在显著差异,微创手术和较新的手术表现出更高的不平等。主要研究结果表明,诸如植皮术和微创胃切除术等手术的PAI得分最高,而剖宫产术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的得分最低。该研究强调,更高的不平等与更大的市场集中度相关,特别是提供这些手术的医院较少。这些发现强调了需要有针对性的政策干预措施来解决手术可及性差异问题,以促进美国各地更公平的医疗服务提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/359e/11574731/f45e0cd8e3fd/qxae142f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/359e/11574731/6ec31ff9e3b3/qxae142f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/359e/11574731/f45e0cd8e3fd/qxae142f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/359e/11574731/6ec31ff9e3b3/qxae142f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/359e/11574731/f45e0cd8e3fd/qxae142f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.衡量美国医院住院手术可及性不平等情况
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 6;2(11):qxae142. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae142. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Geographical health inequalities in India: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access and healthcare inequality.印度的地理健康不平等:COVID-19 大流行对医疗保健获取和医疗保健不平等的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2024 Nov 19;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):42-67. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2023-0030.
3
Each Uterus Counts: A narrative review of health disparities in benign gynaecology and minimal access surgery.每个子宫都算数:良性妇科和微创外科健康差异的叙事性综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview.医疗保健成本与利用项目:概述
Eff Clin Pract. 2002 May-Jun;5(3):143-51.
5
Did the poor gain from India's health policy interventions? Evidence from benefit-incidence analysis, 2004-2018.印度的卫生政策干预措施使穷人受益了吗?来自受益-发生率分析的证据,2004-2018 年。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 10;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01489-0.
6
Development and Assessment of a Systematic Approach for Detecting Disparities in Surgical Access.开发和评估一种系统方法,以检测手术机会中的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Mar 1;156(3):239-245. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5668.
7
Does Hypothetical Centralization of Revision THA and TKA Exacerbate Existing Geographic or Demographic Disparities in Access to Care by Increased Patient Travel Distances or Times? A Large-database Study.是否假设的全膝关节置换术和髋关节置换术翻修的集中化会通过增加患者的旅行距离或时间而加剧现有的地理或人口差异对护理的获取?一项大型数据库研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jun 1;480(6):1033-1045. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002072. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
New evidence on geographic disparities in United States hospital capacity.美国医院容量的地域差异的新证据。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1006-1019. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14010. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
9
Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review.美国医疗机构微创外科利用不足:回顾性研究。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 8;349:g4198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4198.
10
Socio-economic inequality and inequity in use of health care services in Kenya: evidence from the fourth Kenya household health expenditure and utilization survey.肯尼亚医疗服务利用中的社会经济不平等和不公平:来自第四次肯尼亚家庭健康支出和利用调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 18;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1106-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to Laparoscopic Pediatric Surgery: Do Ethnic and Racial Disparities Exist?腹腔镜儿科手术的可及性:是否存在种族和民族差异?
J Surg Res. 2024 Apr;296:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.041. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Policy solutions to eliminate racial and ethnic child health disparities in the USA.消除美国种族和民族儿童健康差异的政策解决方案。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Feb;8(2):159-174. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00262-6.
3
Limited Access to Aortic Valve Procedures in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Areas.社会经济处于不利地位地区主动脉瓣手术的机会有限。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;13(2):e030569. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030569. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Insurance-Based Disparities in Stroke Center Access in California: A Network Science Approach.基于保险的加利福尼亚州卒中中心准入差异:网络科学方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Oct;16(10):e009868. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009868. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
5
Age Disparities in Access to First and Repeat Kidney Transplantation.年龄对首次和再次肾移植机会的影响。
Transplantation. 2024 Apr 1;108(4):845-853. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004747. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Enrollment of Older Patients, Women, and Racial and Ethnic Minority Individuals in Valvular Heart Disease Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.老年患者、女性以及种族和少数民族个体在心脏瓣膜病临床试验中的入组情况:一项系统评价。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;8(9):871-878. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2098.
7
Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery After Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: A Multistate Evaluation.平价医疗法案实施后,医疗补助扩大覆盖范围后,择期结直肠癌手术机会仍存在持续差异:一项多州评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Sep 1;66(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002560. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Insurance Disparities in Access to Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.保险对结直肠癌机器人手术可及性的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3560-3568. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13354-1. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
9
Inequities in surgical outcomes by race and sex in the United States: retrospective cohort study.美国手术结果的种族和性别不平等:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 1;380:e073290. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073290.
10
Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Acutely Decompensated Severe Aortic Stenosis.急性失代偿性严重主动脉瓣狭窄的紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术
Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;62(17):2449-2450. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1416-22. Epub 2023 Feb 1.