Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine (Drs. Pollack and Chang), St. Louis, MO.
Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine (Dr. Olsen), St. Louis, MO.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(5):1167-1177.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Evaluate racial/ethnic variation in hysterectomy surgical route in women likely eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Cross-sectional study.
Multistate including Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York.
Women aged ≥18 years without diagnoses of leiomyomas, obesity, or previous abdominopelvic surgery who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from the State Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Databases, 2010-2014.
None. Primary exposure is race/ethnicity.
Racial/ethnic variation in annual hysterectomy rates and surgical route. To calculate hysterectomy rates per 100 000 women/year, denominators were adjusted for the proportion of women with previous hysterectomy. A marginal structural log binomial regression model was used to estimate adjusted standardized prevalence ratios (aPRs) for vaginal or laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy, controlling for clustering within hospitals. In addition, hospitals were stratified into quintiles to examine surgical route in hospitals that serve a higher vs lower proportion of African American patients. A total of 133 082 adult women underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2010 to 2014. Annual laparoscopic rates increased more slowly for African Americans (1.6-fold) than for whites (1.8-fold) and Hispanics (1.9-fold). African American and Hispanic women were less likely to undergo vaginal (aPR = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.96 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.97, respectively) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (aPR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98, respectively) than white women; Asian/Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo vaginal hysterectomy (aPR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96). Hospitals serving a higher proportion of African American persons performed more abdominal and fewer vaginal procedures across all groups, and more racial/ethnic minority women sought care at those hospitals than white women.
African American, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander women eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy were more likely than white women to receive abdominal hysterectomy. The proportion of all women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy was highest at hospitals serving higher proportions of African American persons. This difference in treatment type can lead to disparities in outcomes, in part owing to their association with complications.
评估在可能适合微创子宫切除术的女性中,子宫切除术手术途径的种族/民族差异。
横断面研究。
包括科罗拉多州、佛罗里达州、马里兰州、新泽西州和纽约州在内的多州。
年龄≥18 岁、无子宫肌瘤、肥胖或既往腹盆腔手术史的女性,在这些州的住院和门诊手术数据库中,因良性疾病接受子宫切除术。
无。主要暴露因素为种族/民族。
每年子宫切除术率和手术途径的种族/民族差异。为了计算每 10 万女性/年的子宫切除术率,分母根据既往子宫切除术的比例进行了调整。使用边缘结构对数二项回归模型,控制了医院内的聚类,估计了阴道或腹腔镜与剖腹子宫切除术的调整标准化流行率比(aPR)。此外,还将医院分层为五分位数,以检查服务于较高比例和较低比例非裔美国患者的医院的手术途径。共有 133082 名成年女性在 2010 年至 2014 年间因良性疾病接受了子宫切除术。非裔美国人的腹腔镜手术比例增长缓慢(1.6 倍),而白人(1.8 倍)和西班牙裔(1.9 倍)则增长较快。与白人女性相比,非裔美国女性(aPR=0.93;95%CI,0.90-0.96 和 aPR=0.95;95%CI 0.93-0.97)和西班牙裔女性(aPR=0.90;95%CI,0.87-0.94 和 aPR=0.95;95%CI,0.92-0.98)不太可能接受阴道(aPR=0.90;95%CI,0.87-0.94 和 aPR=0.95;95%CI,0.92-0.98)和腹腔镜子宫切除术;与白人女性相比,亚裔/太平洋岛裔女性不太可能接受阴道子宫切除术(aPR=0.88;95%CI,0.81-0.96)。在所有人群中,服务于较高比例非裔美国人的医院进行的腹部手术较多,阴道手术较少,并且这些医院的少数民族女性比白人女性寻求的治疗更多。
有资格接受微创子宫切除术的非裔美国、西班牙裔和亚裔/太平洋岛裔女性比白人女性更有可能接受剖腹子宫切除术。在服务于较高比例非裔美国人的医院中,所有接受腹部子宫切除术的女性比例最高。这种治疗类型的差异会导致结果的差异,部分原因是它们与并发症有关。