Queen Mary, Institute of Dentistry, Centre for Dental Public Health and Primary Care, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London, London, UK.
Formerly University of Portsmouth Dental Academy, Portsmouth, UK.
Gerodontology. 2022 Sep;39(3):241-249. doi: 10.1111/ger.12562. Epub 2021 May 20.
To compare the acceptability and perceived helpfulness of an e-Oral Health intervention in form of text messages versus standard dental leaflets provided after a dental visit to patients aged 65 years and over.
Oral health care needs for older people are increasing. Remote interventions using e-Health can ensure oral care is provided despite physical hindrances or situations where dental appointments are limited such as has happened more widely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mixed-method nested study within a pilot trial. Dental patients (n = 150) at an outreach primary dental care centre, ≥ 65 years old, were recruited and randomly allocated to e-Oral health text messages or leaflet intervention arms. Post-intervention (6 months), participants responded to open and closed-ended two-way survey phone texts. Survey questions investigated: (a) whether they would recommend the intervention, (b) intervention helpfulness and (c) OPEN feedback. Average helpfulness scores (Scale:1= Very Helpful to 5= Not Helpful at All) were compared for each arm using Independent Sample t-test. Percentage of participants providing positive recommendations in each arm were compared using chi-squared tests. Qualitative findings were analysed using thematic analysis.
N = 68 (45%) responded. Mean helpfulness scores in text group M = 2.2, SD=1.1) and leaflet group M = 2.3, SD=1.9, P = .29. Amongst the text arm respondents, 89% compared with 68.2% in leaflet arm; P = .005 would recommend the intervention. Four qualitative themes were outlined: intervention approach, content, behavioural impact and recommendations.
e-Oral Health text interventions are acceptable and helpful to older people, but these messages need to be tailored.
比较电子口腔健康干预措施(以短信形式提供)与牙科就诊后提供的标准牙科传单在 65 岁及以上患者中的可接受性和感知有用性。
老年人的口腔保健需求正在增加。使用电子健康的远程干预措施可以确保在存在身体障碍或牙科预约有限的情况下提供口腔保健,例如在 COVID-19 大流行期间更为广泛地出现了这种情况。
在一项试点试验中进行的混合方法嵌套研究。在一个外展初级牙科保健中心招募了(n=150)年龄在 65 岁及以上的牙科患者,并将他们随机分配到电子口腔健康短信或传单干预组。在干预后(6 个月),参与者通过双向调查电话文本回答了开放式和封闭式问题。调查问题调查了:(a)他们是否会推荐干预措施,(b)干预的有用性和(c)开放性反馈。使用独立样本 t 检验比较了每个手臂的平均有用性评分(量表:1=非常有用到 5=完全没有帮助)。使用卡方检验比较了每个手臂中提供积极推荐的参与者的百分比。使用主题分析对定性发现进行了分析。
n=68(45%)做出了回应。短信组的平均有用性评分 M=2.2,SD=1.1)和传单组 M=2.3,SD=1.9,P=。在短信组的受访者中,89%与传单组的 68.2%相比;P=。005 会推荐干预措施。概述了四个定性主题:干预方法、内容、行为影响和建议。
电子口腔健康短信干预措施对老年人是可接受和有用的,但这些信息需要进行定制。