J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Mar;122(3):640-649.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 18.
Home gardens may help address childhood malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries. In this quasi-experimental pilot study, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, in collaboration with Maya Health Alliance, evaluated the feasibility of augmenting a standard-of-care nutrition-specific package for Maya children with length-for-age z score ≤-2 (stunting) in rural Guatemala with a nutrition-sensitive home garden intervention. Two agrarian municipalities in Guatemala were included. Families of 70 children with stunting from 1 municipality received the standard-of-care package (food supplementation, multiple micronutrient powders, monthly nutrition home visits, group nutrition classes). Families of 70 children with stunting from another municipality received the standard-of-care package plus a home garden intervention (garden materials, monthly agricultural home visits, agriculture classes). Maternal and child dietary diversity, household food insecurity, child growth, and agricultural indicators were collected at baseline and 6 months later and were analyzed using mixed linear and logistic regression models. Compared with the standard-of-care group, the garden intervention group had improved child (odds ratio [OR] 3.66, 95% CI 0.89-15.10, P = 0.07) and maternal dietary diversity (OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.80-6.65, P = 0.12) and decreased food insecurity (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.35, P = 0.14); however, these effects were not statistically significant. Participation in gardens predicted a higher length-for-age z-score (change difference [CD] 0.22 SD, 95% CI 0.05-0.38, P = 0.009), greater crop species count (CD 2.97 crops, 95% CI 1.79-4.16, P < 0.001), and greater nutritional functional diversity (CD 0.04 points, 95% CI 0.01-0.07, P = 0.006) than standard-of-care alone. Home garden interventions are feasible in rural Guatemala and may have potential benefits for child growth when added to other nutrition-specific interventions.
家庭菜园可能有助于解决中低收入国家儿童的营养不良问题。在这项准实验性试点研究中,营养学会与玛雅健康联盟合作,评估了在危地马拉农村为标准护理营养特定方案中年龄别身长 Z 分数≤-2(发育迟缓)的玛雅儿童补充营养敏感型家庭菜园干预措施的可行性。危地马拉的两个农业市被纳入研究。一个市的 70 名发育迟缓儿童的家庭接受了标准护理方案(食物补充、多种微量营养素粉末、每月家庭营养访问、小组营养课程)。另一个市的 70 名发育迟缓儿童的家庭接受了标准护理方案加家庭菜园干预(花园材料、每月农业家庭访问、农业课程)。在基线和 6 个月后收集了母亲和儿童的饮食多样性、家庭粮食不安全、儿童生长和农业指标数据,并使用混合线性和逻辑回归模型进行了分析。与标准护理组相比,菜园干预组儿童(比值比 [OR] 3.66,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.89-15.10,P=0.07)和母亲的饮食多样性(OR 2.31,95%CI 0.80-6.65,P=0.12)得到改善,粮食不安全程度降低(OR 0.38,95%CI 0.11-1.35,P=0.14);然而,这些影响没有统计学意义。参与菜园种植预测年龄别身长 Z 评分较高(差异变化 [CD] 0.22 标准差,95%CI 0.05-0.38,P=0.009),作物种类较多(CD 2.97 种,95%CI 1.79-4.16,P<0.001),营养功能多样性较高(CD 0.04 分,95%CI 0.01-0.07,P=0.006),优于单纯的标准护理。家庭菜园干预在危地马拉农村是可行的,当与其他特定营养干预措施结合使用时,可能对儿童生长有潜在益处。