Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):1794-1803. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0844. Epub 2021 May 21.
To examine the effect of continuous (CON) and intermittent (INT) running training sessions of different durations and intensities on subsequent performance and calculated training load (TL).
Runners (N = 11) performed a 1500-m time trial as a baseline and after completing 4 different running training sessions. The training sessions were performed in a randomized order and were either maximal for 10 minutes (10CON and 10INT) or submaximal for 25 minutes (25CON and 25INT). An acute performance decrement (APD) was calculated as the percentage change in 1500-m time-trial speed measured after training compared with baseline. The pattern of APD response was compared with that for several TL metrics (bTRIMP, eTRIMP, iTRIMP, running training stress score, and session rating of perceived exertion) for the respective training sessions.
Average speed (P < .001, ηp2=.924) was different for each of the initial training sessions, which all resulted in a significant APD. This APD was similar when compared across the sessions except for a greater APD found after 10INT versus 25CON (P = .02). In contrast, most TL metrics were different and showed the opposite response to APD, being higher for CON versus INT and lower for 10- versus 25-minute sessions (P < .001, ηp2>.563).
An APD was observed consistently after running training sessions, but it was not consistent with most of the calculated TL metrics. The lack of agreement found between APD and TL suggests that current methods for quantifying TL are flawed when used to compare CON and INT running training sessions of different durations and intensities.
研究不同持续时间和强度的连续(CON)和间歇(INT)跑步训练对后续表现和计算的训练负荷(TL)的影响。
跑步者(N=11)进行了 1500 米计时赛作为基线,然后完成了 4 次不同的跑步训练。这些训练以随机顺序进行,要么最大强度进行 10 分钟(10CON 和 10INT),要么亚最大强度进行 25 分钟(25CON 和 25INT)。急性表现下降(APD)作为训练后与基线相比 1500 米计时赛速度的百分比变化来计算。将 APD 反应的模式与各自训练课程的几个 TL 指标(bTRIMP、eTRIMP、iTRIMP、跑步训练应激评分和会话感知用力评分)进行比较。
每个初始训练课程的平均速度(P<0.001,ηp2=0.924)都不同,所有课程都导致了显著的 APD。当比较各课程时,APD 相似,但在 10INT 与 25CON 之间发现了更大的 APD(P=0.02)。相比之下,大多数 TL 指标不同,对 APD 的反应相反,CON 比 INT 更高,10 分钟比 25 分钟课程更低(P<0.001,ηp2>.563)。
在跑步训练课程后,始终观察到 APD,但它与大多数计算的 TL 指标不一致。在 APD 和 TL 之间发现的不一致表明,当用于比较不同持续时间和强度的 CON 和 INT 跑步训练课程时,当前量化 TL 的方法存在缺陷。