Suppr超能文献

肝素钠与0.9%氯化钠注射液用于维持留置间歇性输液装置通畅性的比较

Heparin sodium versus 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency of indwelling intermittent infusion devices.

作者信息

Hamilton R A, Plis J M, Clay C, Sylvan L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College, NY 12208.

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1988 Jun;7(6):439-43.

PMID:3402178
Abstract

In a double-blind study, heparin sodium was compared with 0.9% sodium chloride injection for use in maintaining patency of indwelling devices for intermittent intravenous infusion. Adult patients who required intermittent intravenous devices were randomly assigned to receive 1 mL of a heparin sodium 100 units/mL flush solution or a 0.9% sodium chloride flush solution. Observations were recorded for each catheter, rather than for each patient. Patients were evaluated daily for the development of phlebitis. In the 160 patients for whom complete data on catheter patency were available, there were 307 observations (170 for the heparin group and 137 for the sodium chloride group). No significant difference in the duration of catheter patency or incidence of phlebitis was observed between the groups. A difference in the incidence of phlebitis could not be excluded with confidence, but inasmuch as there was no effect on duration of catheter patency, the clinical importance of this superficial venous phlebitis is questionable. The duration of patency was significantly greater in men than in women. The use of penicillins, cephalosporins, or clindamycin, alone or in combination, was significantly associated with the development of phlebitis for both treatment groups. No other factors were found to correlate with either the duration of catheter patency or incidence of phlebitis. The results of this study indicate that heparin offers no advantage over 0.9% sodium chloride injection in maintaining the patency of intermittent intravenous devices.

摘要

在一项双盲研究中,比较了肝素钠与0.9%氯化钠注射液用于维持间歇性静脉输液留置装置通畅的效果。需要间歇性静脉输液装置的成年患者被随机分配接受1 mL每毫升含100单位肝素钠的冲管溶液或0.9%氯化钠冲管溶液。观察记录针对每根导管,而非每位患者。每天评估患者是否发生静脉炎。在可获得导管通畅完整数据的160例患者中,共有307次观察(肝素组170次,氯化钠组137次)。两组之间在导管通畅持续时间或静脉炎发生率方面未观察到显著差异。静脉炎发生率的差异虽不能完全排除,但鉴于对导管通畅持续时间无影响,这种浅表静脉炎的临床重要性值得怀疑。男性的通畅持续时间显著长于女性。对于两个治疗组,单独或联合使用青霉素、头孢菌素或克林霉素均与静脉炎的发生显著相关。未发现其他因素与导管通畅持续时间或静脉炎发生率相关。本研究结果表明,在维持间歇性静脉输液装置通畅方面,肝素钠并不比0.9%氯化钠注射液更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验