Suppr超能文献

药师和技师对化疗医嘱的二次核对和错误发现率。

Chemotherapy order second check and error discovery rates by pharmacists and technicians.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Sep-Oct;61(5):e132-e141. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists suggests that pharmacy practice models allow pharmacists to be readily available as organizational leaders. This project aimed to identify potential process improvements to increase pharmacist availability to perform more clinical activities.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy technicians performing chemotherapy second checks at an outpatient infusion clinic.

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

Intermountain Medical Center is a Level 1 Trauma Center. The infusion clinic treats a variety of oncology indications, with solid organ tumors being most prevalent. At Intermountain Healthcare, a second pharmacist reverifies all chemotherapy orders for accuracy of drug, dose, preparation, and administration instructions.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

Pharmacy technicians are in a unique position to assist with chemotherapy second checks because they are already knowledgeable in compounding and reviewing chemotherapy. This would be particularly useful in rural settings where staffing is sparse.

EVALUATION METHODS

This was a single-center prospective analysis of chemotherapy second-check processes at an outpatient infusion clinic. Once chemotherapy orders were sent to the infusion clinic, first and second checks were completed to verify the correct patient, medication(s), dose calculations, diluents, administration rates, volumes, and other instructions. The chemotherapy first checks were completed by a pharmacist. The second checks were completed by a second pharmacist and a chemotherapy-trained certified pharmacy technician. The second checks by the pharmacist and technician were compared to determine if they were in agreement regarding error identification. Any disagreements found between the 2 second checks or between the first check and either of the second checks were discussed before compounding. We evaluated whether a chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician could identify the same errors as a pharmacist.

RESULTS

The Cohen kappa test was used to determine rater agreement between the pharmacist and technician second checks. The kappa value measure of inter-rater reliability between pharmacist and chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technician was excellent (kappa = 0.88, P < 0.001). They agreed 96.8% of the time, with technicians correctly identifying more errors.

CONCLUSION

This project illustrates that chemotherapy-trained pharmacy technicians may be capable of performing chemotherapy second checks as accurately as pharmacists.

摘要

背景

美国卫生系统药剂师学会建议,药剂师应采用药学实践模式,以便随时担任组织领导。本项目旨在确定潜在的流程改进措施,以增加药剂师可用于执行更多临床活动的时间。

目的

我们评估了在门诊输液诊所中由药剂技术员执行化疗二次核对的效果。

实践描述

内陆医学中心是一级创伤中心。输液诊所治疗各种肿瘤适应症,以实体肿瘤最为常见。在山间保健医疗系统中,第二位药剂师会对所有化疗医嘱进行复查,以确保药物、剂量、制剂和给药说明的准确性。

实践创新

药剂技术员在协助化疗二次核对方面具有独特的优势,因为他们已经具备化合物和审查化疗的知识。在人员配置稀少的农村地区,这将特别有用。

评估方法

这是对门诊输液诊所化疗二次核对流程的单中心前瞻性分析。一旦化疗医嘱发送至输液诊所,就会进行第一次和第二次核对,以验证正确的患者、药物、剂量计算、赋形剂、给药速率、体积和其他说明。第一次核对由药剂师完成。第二次核对由第二位药剂师和接受过化疗培训的认证药剂技术员完成。比较药剂师和技术员的第二次核对结果,以确定他们在识别错误方面是否一致。在进行化合物制备之前,会讨论在两次核对之间或第一次核对与第二次核对之间发现的任何分歧。我们评估了接受过化疗培训的药剂技术员是否能够识别与药剂师相同的错误。

结果

采用 Cohen kappa 检验评估药剂师和技术员第二次核对之间的评分者一致性。药剂师和接受过化疗培训的药剂技术员之间的二次核对评分者间可靠性的kappa 值测量值为优秀(kappa = 0.88,P < 0.001)。他们有 96.8%的时间是一致的,技术员正确识别的错误更多。

结论

该项目表明,接受过化疗培训的药剂技术员可能能够像药剂师一样准确地执行化疗二次核对。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验