Dipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Nov;180(11):3335-3342. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04124-w. Epub 2021 May 22.
Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 among the population has occurred quite recently, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term duration of antibody response, especially in children. It is therefore crucial to clarify this aspect, considering its implications in the development of successful surveillance strategies, therapies, and vaccinations. The aim of this study was to assess the antibody response in a children group after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to compare it with that of their parents affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. We enrolled 12 children and their parents, both groups being affected by COVID-19 in April 2020. In the children's group, we collected real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and gene characterization of first nasal-throat swab at the time of diagnosis (T0); 30 days after the diagnosis (T30), we performed blood tests to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG. Finally, 180 days after the diagnosis (T180), we measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in both children and parents. In children, antibody levels declined significantly at 180 days (T180) after first measurement (T30). There were no significant differences in IgG level related to age, sex, and clinical manifestations. We found a significant correlation between IgG titers at T30 and Ct value of gene N. Children showed a lower level of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at T180 compared to their parents.Conclusion: Antibody responses in children waned 180 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and at the same time, their parents showed a different antibody response to the virus. These results highlight that serological tests should be used with caution in surveillance strategies among the general population. What is known: • Currently is not known how long antibody response will be maintained or if it protects from reinfection. • Recent reports in adults suggest that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 declined several months after infection, but data are missing in pediatric age. What is new: • We showed that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 wane several months after infection also in children with quantitative differences in antibody levels between children and adults. • In this context, serological tests should be used with caution in surveillance strategies.
由于人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的爆发发生得相对较晚,因此缺乏关于抗体反应持续时间的证据,尤其是在儿童中。因此,澄清这一方面至关重要,因为这对成功的监测策略、疗法和疫苗接种有影响。本研究的目的是评估一组儿童感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的抗体反应,并将其与受 SARS-CoV-2 感染影响的父母的抗体反应进行比较。我们招募了 12 名儿童及其父母,两组均于 2020 年 4 月感染了 COVID-19。在儿童组中,我们在诊断时(T0)收集了实时 RT-PCR 循环阈值(Ct)值和第一份鼻喉拭子的基因特征;在诊断后 30 天(T30),我们进行了血液检查以检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG。最后,在诊断后 180 天(T180),我们测量了儿童和父母的抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG。在儿童中,与首次测量(T30)相比,在 180 天后(T180)抗体水平显著下降。IgG 水平与年龄、性别和临床表现无关。我们发现 T30 时 IgG 滴度与基因 N 的 Ct 值之间存在显著相关性。儿童在 T180 时显示出针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体水平低于其父母。结论:儿童在 SARS-CoV-2 感染后 180 天抗体反应减弱,而同时其父母对病毒的抗体反应不同。这些结果强调了在一般人群的监测策略中应谨慎使用血清学检测。已知的:•目前尚不清楚抗体反应将持续多久,或者它是否能防止再次感染。•最近的成人报告表明,感染 SARS-CoV-2 几个月后,针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体下降,但儿童时期的数据缺失。新的:•我们表明,感染 SARS-CoV-2 后,抗体反应也会在几个月后减弱,儿童与成人之间的抗体水平存在定量差异。•在这种情况下,血清学检测应在监测策略中谨慎使用。