Ranci Francesco
Member, History of Sociology and Social Thought Section, ASA - American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C., USA.
Am Sociol. 2021;52(2):390-419. doi: 10.1007/s12108-021-09489-x. Epub 2021 May 19.
Erving Goffman's written legacy bears on sociology as a whole, or so he argued in his Presidential Address to the American Sociological Association (Goffman, 1983). However, while being celebrated as important to the discipline, his work is also interpreted in inconsistent ways, often downplayed or marginalized, and even neglected. This paper claims that Goffman's "well known aversion to self-disclosure" (Shalin, 2013) does not justify overlooking his trajectory, from the unknown "margins" of a Canadian small town to the elusive "center" of American sociology-and much less does it justify still circulating assessments of his personality, crafted while overlooking his life experiences-and, especially, his writings. Anecdotal evidence of his "enigmatic" personality (Lemert, 2003), or "bad-boy outrageousness" (Berger, 1986), works as a derailing tactic, leading to unwarranted appraisals of Goffman's personality-and, more importantly, to the neglect of crucial aspects of his work. From a theoretical standpoint, Simmel's treatment of "the stranger" as a social relationship, and Merton's concept of "moral alchemy", are used here to try to make some sense of the mixture of celebration and neglect still surrounding "Goffman". Historical data was gathered in part from the "Erving Goffman Archives'' (Shalin, 2013).
欧文·戈夫曼的著作遗产对整个社会学都有影响,至少他在对美国社会学协会的主席致辞中是这么认为的(戈夫曼,1983年)。然而,尽管他的作品被誉为对该学科很重要,但人们对其的解读方式却并不一致,常常被淡化、边缘化,甚至被忽视。本文认为,戈夫曼“众所周知的对自我表露的厌恶”(沙林,2013年)并不能成为忽视他从加拿大一个小镇不为人知的“边缘”走向美国社会学难以捉摸的“中心”这一轨迹的理由——更不能成为仍在流传的、在忽视他的生活经历尤其是他的作品的情况下塑造出来的对他性格的评价的理由。关于他“神秘”性格(勒默特,2003年)或“坏男孩的离谱行为”(伯杰,1986年)的轶事证据,起到了一种干扰策略的作用,导致对戈夫曼性格的无端评价——更重要的是,导致对他作品关键方面的忽视。从理论角度来看,这里运用了齐美尔对作为一种社会关系的“陌生人”的论述以及默顿的“道德炼金术”概念,来试图理解围绕“戈夫曼”的赞誉与忽视交织的情况。历史数据部分取自“欧文·戈夫曼档案”(沙林,2013年)。