Suppr超能文献

评估人类和啮齿动物的冲动性:走翻译之路。

Assessing Impulsivity in Humans and Rodents: Taking the Translational Road.

作者信息

Esteves Madalena, Moreira Pedro Silva, Sousa Nuno, Leite-Almeida Hugo

机构信息

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 May 6;15:647922. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.647922. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct encompassing domains of behavioral inhibition as well as of decision making. It is often adaptive and associated with fast responses, being in that sense physiological. However, abnormal manifestations of impulsive behavior can be observed in contexts of drug abuse and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), among others. A number of tools have therefore been devised to assess the different facets of impulsivity in both normal and pathological contexts. In this narrative review, we systematize behavioral and self-reported measures of impulsivity and critically discuss their constructs and limitations, establishing a parallel between assessments in humans and rodents. The first rely on paradigms that are typically designed to assess a specific dimension of impulsivity, within either impulsive action (inability to suppress a prepotent action) or impulsive choice, which implies a decision that weighs the costs and benefits of the options. On the other hand, self-reported measures are performed through questionnaires, allowing assessment of impulsivity dimensions that would be difficult to mimic in an experimental setting (e.g., positive/negative urgency and lack of premeditation) and which are therefore difficult (if not impossible) to measure in rodents.

摘要

冲动性是一个多维概念,涵盖行为抑制和决策领域。它通常具有适应性,与快速反应相关,从这个意义上讲是生理性的。然而,在药物滥用和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)等情况下,可以观察到冲动行为的异常表现。因此,已经设计了许多工具来评估正常和病理情况下冲动性的不同方面。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们对冲动性的行为和自我报告测量方法进行了系统化,并批判性地讨论了它们的概念和局限性,在人类和啮齿动物的评估之间建立了平行关系。前者依赖于通常设计用于评估冲动性特定维度的范式,在冲动行为(无法抑制优势动作)或冲动选择中,这意味着要权衡选项成本和收益的决策。另一方面,自我报告测量是通过问卷进行的,允许评估在实验环境中难以模拟的冲动性维度(例如,积极/消极紧迫感和缺乏预谋),因此在啮齿动物中很难(如果不是不可能)测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3326/8134540/cea8b67267f6/fnbeh-15-647922-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验