Wang Jia-Chi, Tsai Po-Yi, Hsu Po-Cheng, Huang Jian-Ru, Wang Kevin A, Chou Chen-Liang, Chang Ke-Vin
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 7;12:686139. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.686139. eCollection 2021.
For patients with adhesive capsulitis, hydrodilatation is typically performed using corticosteroids with ultrasound guidance via the posterior glenohumeral recess. Recently, a new intervention technique via the rotator cuff interval has been described. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hydrodilatation with triamcinolone acetonide via the posterior glenohumeral recess and the rotator cuff interval in patients with adhesive capsulitis. This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care center with a follow-up period of 12 weeks. We enrolled 64 patients diagnosed with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. The subjects were randomly assigned to two groups that received hydrodilatation with corticosteroids either through the posterior glenohumeral recess or though the rotator cuff interval. The injection contained 4 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg) mixed with 4 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride and 12 ml of normal saline. The shoulder pain and disability index, visual analog scale for pain, and range of motion were analyzed before and at 6 and 12 weeks after the treatment. Both groups experienced improvements in the visual analog scale scores, shoulder pain and disability index scores, and range of motion throughout the study period. A significant group-time interaction was observed in terms of the visual analog scale for pain during motion ( = 0.019), favoring hydrodilatation through the rotator cuff interval. Thus, hydrodilatation through the rotator cuff interval might be a better treatment option than that through the posterior glenohumeral recess for patients with adhesive capsulitis, considering its superior effect in alleviating pain during shoulder movement.
对于患有粘连性关节囊炎的患者,通常在超声引导下经肩胛下隐窝使用皮质类固醇进行关节腔扩张术。最近,一种经肩袖间隙的新干预技术已被描述。本研究旨在比较经肩胛下隐窝和经肩袖间隙使用曲安奈德进行关节腔扩张术对粘连性关节囊炎患者的疗效。这项前瞻性随机对照试验在一家三级医疗中心进行,随访期为12周。我们纳入了64例被诊断为肩部粘连性关节囊炎的患者。受试者被随机分为两组,分别通过肩胛下隐窝或肩袖间隙接受皮质类固醇关节腔扩张术。注射剂包含4毫升曲安奈德(40毫克)与4毫升2%盐酸利多卡因和12毫升生理盐水混合。在治疗前以及治疗后6周和12周分析肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数、疼痛视觉模拟量表以及活动范围。在整个研究期间,两组在视觉模拟量表评分、肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数评分以及活动范围方面均有改善。在运动时的疼痛视觉模拟量表方面观察到显著的组-时间交互作用(=0.019),支持经肩袖间隙的关节腔扩张术。因此,考虑到经肩袖间隙的关节腔扩张术在减轻肩部运动时疼痛方面的 superior 效果,对于粘连性关节囊炎患者而言,经肩袖间隙的关节腔扩张术可能是比经肩胛下隐窝更好的治疗选择。 (注:原文中“superior”未翻译完整,推测可能是想说“更好的、更优越的”之类意思,这里按推测补充完整翻译)