Gorgulu Recep, Gokcek Eslem
Elite Performance in Sport Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa Turkey.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe Universit, Ankara Turkey.
J Hum Kinet. 2021 Mar 31;78:239-249. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0039. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Wegner predicts that under pressure self-avoiding instructions not to perform in a certain manner will break down precisely where it is least desired that is the hypothesis of the present study. Specifically, the aim was to test the hypothesis that when instructed not to serve into a certain zone, ironic error would be more prevalent under pressure. Our sample comprised 43 female participants between the age of 13 and 16 (M = 14.51, SD = 1.35) who were active volleyball players (M = 5.40, SD = 2.38). We measured the participants' psychophysiological indications of anxiety via the heart rate, heart rate variability as well as the self-reported Mental Readiness Form-3. To measure performance, we counted the number of target and non-target serving zones under different anxiety conditions. Participants scored +5 points for serving into the target zone, scored -5 points for serving to the out or hitting the net and 1 point for serving into the court except the target zone. A 2 (anxiety) × 3 (serving zone) fully repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant anxiety x serving zone interaction F (2, 84) = 36.52, p < .001. When instructed not to serve in a certain zone, players' overall performance did not change across anxiety conditions t (42) = .68, p =.50. Results did not provide support for the Wegner's theory as expected, but instead revealed evidence for the Woodman et al.'s (2015) differentiation of ironic performance error. The results demonstrate that the theory of ironic processes may account for practical instruction-based solution for reducing the susceptibility to ironic errors in the serving type of task in volleyball.
韦格纳预测,在压力下,避免以某种方式行事的自我指令恰恰会在最不希望出现的地方失效,这就是本研究的假设。具体而言,目的是检验这一假设:当被指示不要将球发到某个区域时,在压力下具有讽刺意味的失误会更普遍。我们的样本包括43名年龄在13至16岁之间的女性参与者(M = 14.51,标准差 = 1.35),她们都是活跃的排球运动员(M = 5.40,标准差 = 2.38)。我们通过心率、心率变异性以及自我报告的《心理准备量表-3》来测量参与者焦虑的心理生理指标。为了测量表现,我们统计了不同焦虑条件下目标发球区和非目标发球区的数量。参与者将球发到目标区得+5分,发到界外或触网得 -5分,发到除目标区外的场内得1分。一项2(焦虑)×3(发球区)的完全重复测量方差分析显示,焦虑×发球区存在显著交互作用,F(2, 84) = 36.52,p <.001。当被指示不要在某个区域发球时,球员在不同焦虑条件下的整体表现没有变化,t(42) =.68,p =.50。结果并未如预期那样支持韦格纳的理论,而是揭示了伍德曼等人(2015年)关于具有讽刺意味的表现失误差异的证据。结果表明,具有讽刺意味的过程理论可能为减少排球发球类任务中出现具有讽刺意味失误的易感性提供基于实际指令的解决方案。