Almefty Rami O, Xu David S, Mooney Michael A, Montoure Andrew, Naeem Komal, Coons Stephen W, Spetzler Robert F, Porter Randall W
Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jun;82(3):333-337. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697039. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
Cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) are anecdotally believed to have worse clinical and tumor-control outcomes than solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs); however, no data have been reported to support this belief. In this study, we characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with CVSs versus those with SVSs. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. This study is set at single high-volume neurosurgical institute. We queried a database for details on all patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannomas between January 2009 and January 2014. Records were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses to study the differences in clinical outcomes and tumor progression or recurrence. Of a total of 112 tumors, 24% ( = 27) were CVSs and 76% ( = 85) were SVSs. Univariate analysis identified the extent of resection, Koos grade, and tumor diameter as significant predictors of recurrence ( ≤ 0.005). However, tumor diameter was the only significant predictor of recurrence in the multivariate analysis ( = 0.007). Cystic change was not a predictor of recurrence in the univariate or multivariate analysis ( ≥ 0.40). Postoperative facial nerve and hearing outcomes were similar for both CVSs and SVSs ( ≥ 0.47). Postoperative facial nerve outcome, hearing, tumor progression, and recurrence are similar for patients with CVSs and SVSs. As CVS growth patterns and responses to radiation are unpredictable, we favor microsurgical resection over radiosurgery as the initial treatment. Our data do not support the commonly held belief that cystic tumors behave more aggressively than solid tumors or are associated with increased postoperative facial nerve deficits.
据传闻,囊性前庭神经鞘瘤(CVS)的临床和肿瘤控制结果比实性前庭神经鞘瘤(SVS)更差;然而,尚无数据支持这一观点。在本研究中,我们对CVS患者与SVS患者的临床结果进行了特征描述。
这是一项对前瞻性收集的数据进行的回顾性研究。
本研究在一家高容量的单一神经外科机构进行。
我们查询了一个数据库,以获取2009年1月至2014年1月期间所有诊断为前庭神经鞘瘤的患者的详细信息。
对记录进行回顾性审查,并使用单因素和多因素分析进行分析,以研究临床结果以及肿瘤进展或复发的差异。
在总共112个肿瘤中,24%(n = 27)为CVS,76%(n = 85)为SVS。单因素分析确定切除范围、库斯分级和肿瘤直径是复发的重要预测因素(P≤0.005)。然而,在多因素分析中,肿瘤直径是复发的唯一重要预测因素(P = 0.007)。在单因素或多因素分析中,囊性变均不是复发的预测因素(P≥0.40)。CVS和SVS的术后面神经和听力结果相似(P≥0.47)。
CVS和SVS患者的术后面神经结果、听力、肿瘤进展和复发情况相似。由于CVS的生长模式和对放疗的反应不可预测,我们倾向于将显微手术切除而非放射外科作为初始治疗方法。我们的数据不支持普遍认为的囊性肿瘤比实性肿瘤行为更具侵袭性或与术后面神经功能缺损增加相关的观点。