Mul Joeri, Seravalli Enrica, Bosman Mirjam E, van de Ven Cornelis P, Littooij Annemieke S, van Grotel Martine, van den Heuvel-Eibrink Marry M, Janssens Geert O
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 May 3;29:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.007. eCollection 2021 Jul.
For decades, Anterior-Posterior/Posterior-Anterior (AP/PA) photon beams were standard-of-care for flank irradiation in children with renal cancer. Recently, highly conformal flank target volumes were defined correcting for postoperative organ shift and intra-fraction motion.By radiotherapy treatment plan comparison, this study aims to estimate the clinical benefits and potential risks of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional target volumes with AP/PA beams for flank irradiation.
Twenty consecutive renal tumor cases (left/right-sided:10/10; median age:3.2 years) were selected. Highly conformal flank target volumes were generated for VMAT, while conventional target volumes were used for AP/PA. For each case, the dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and Total Body Volume (TBV) was calculated to compare VMAT with AP/PA treatment plans for a prescribed dose (PD) of 14.4/1.8 Gy. Dose constraint violation of the tail of the pancreas and spleen (D < 10 Gy), heart (D < 5 Gy) or mammary buds (D < 10 Gy) were prioritized as potentially beneficial for clinics.
Highly conformal Planning Target Volumes (PTV) were smaller than conventional volumes (mean ΔPTV-PTV: 555 mL, Δ60%, p=<0.01). A mean dose reduction favoring VMAT was observed for almost all OARs. Dose constraints to the tail of the pancreas, spleen, heart and mammary buds were fulfilled in 8/20, 12/20, 16/20 and 19/20 cases with AP/PA, versus 14/20, 17/20, 20/20 and 20/20 cases with VMAT, respectively. In 12/20 cases, VMAT prevented the dose constraint violation of one or more OARs otherwise exceeded by AP/PA. VMAT increased the TBV receiving 10% of the PD, but reduced the amount of irradiated TBV for all higher doses.
Compared to 14.4 Gy flank irradiation using conventional AP/PA photon beams, an estimated clinical benefit by dose reduction to the OARs can be expected in 60% of the pediatric renal tumor cases using highly conformal flank target volumes combined with VMAT.
几十年来,前后/后前(AP/PA)光子束一直是肾癌患儿侧腹照射的标准治疗方式。最近,针对术后器官移位和分次内运动进行了校正,定义了高度适形的侧腹靶区体积。通过放疗治疗计划比较,本研究旨在评估将高度适形靶区体积与容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)相结合,相对于使用AP/PA束的传统靶区体积进行侧腹照射的临床益处和潜在风险。
选取20例连续的肾肿瘤病例(左侧/右侧:10/10;中位年龄:3.2岁)。为VMAT生成高度适形的侧腹靶区体积,而传统靶区体积用于AP/PA照射。对于每例病例,计算危及器官(OARs)和全身体积(TBV)的剂量,以比较VMAT与AP/PA治疗计划在规定剂量(PD)为14.4/1.8 Gy时的情况。将胰腺尾部和脾脏(D < 10 Gy)、心脏(D < 5 Gy)或乳腺芽(D < 10 Gy)的剂量约束违反情况作为对临床可能有益的情况进行优先考虑。
高度适形的计划靶区体积(PTV)小于传统体积(平均ΔPTV - PTV:555 mL,Δ60%,p < 0.01)。几乎所有OARs均观察到有利于VMAT的平均剂量降低。AP/PA照射时,胰腺尾部、脾脏、心脏和乳腺芽的剂量约束在20例中的满足情况分别为8/20、12/20、16/20和19/20,而VMAT照射时分别为14/20、17/20、20/20和20/20。在20例中的12例中,VMAT避免了一个或多个OARs的剂量约束违反,否则这些OARs会被AP/PA超过。VMAT增加了接受10% PD的TBV,但减少了所有更高剂量下受照射的TBV量。
与使用传统AP/PA光子束进行14.4 Gy侧腹照射相比,在60%的小儿肾肿瘤病例中,使用高度适形的侧腹靶区体积联合VMAT预计可通过降低OARs剂量获得临床益处。